PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLANNING Archives - Page 2 of 11

Pensions and Inheritance Tax

Dominic Thomas
Jan 2025 • 2 min read

Pensions and Inheritance Tax

In the first Labour Budget of the current Government, Rachel Reeves announced that from 6^th April 2027, pension funds (investment-based pension funds) would form part of an estate for inheritance tax assessment. This made a number of folk choke on their gin and tonic as they considered their estate in light of this pension reform.

Despite only being elected on 4^th July 2024; now barely six months on and only about three months since her Budget on 30^th October, the Government has been facing growing criticism for lack of economic growth since they took office. To be candid, I’m not sure who is so vexed about this; as any reasonable person would appreciate that the impact of a new Government and policy decisions generally take a while to have any impact on economic growth. So this has probably rather more to do with sentiment than fact (all political bias aside).

Anyway, some of the biggest companies have collaborated to tell the Chancellor that her plans to include pensions within inheritance tax assessments are “bonkers” (my word not theirs!). This includes AJ Bell, Quilter, Hargreaves Lansdown and Interactive Investor, who between them manage £430bn of pensions across around 3.4m people.

I’m not sure how much attention will be given to their pleading, however meritorious, as there is a rather obvious conflict of interest (if the funds are not taxed, then investment firms continue to manage the higher amount).

It would certainly seem that the UK needs some serious spending on its infrastructure, healthcare, education and welfare – so the money has to come from somewhere, but so far the billionaires seem to have been able to reside in their silos like Bond villains and declare that they will move outside the UK should they be required to pay any more tax – perhaps Mars.

There is obviously some unfairness about the Government proposals. It punishes those who saved and didn’t spend it all. There is ample opportunity for not simply one tax (IHT), but the likelihood of further double taxation. One might add that this doesn’t help the younger generations to finally buy a property either. Frankly the complexity of tax rules and pensions will make any adviser (let alone Executor of an estate) squirm with uncertainty when totting up all the assets and calculating the liability (failure for doing this accurately can result in a custodial sentence).

In short, a week is a long time in politics, the few months since the Budget already feel like a lifetime and there may well be a lot of changes before April 2027. So before you panic and blow your retirement planning into some irrevocable strategy, please do consider that change is possible and may be probable.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Pensions and Inheritance TaxJemima Thomas2025-02-17T17:01:29+00:00

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024

Daniel Liddicott
Dec 2024 • 3 min read

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024

Our survey says…

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024 is an annual survey designed to give an overview of how people feel about their preparedness for retirement. Around 4,300 UK adults were surveyed, across all age groups.

This is only the second year that Nucleus have carried out the survey, with 2023 marking the inaugural attempt to gauge the sentiment of UK adults towards their retirement outlook.

The key findings of this survey include:

Low Confidence Levels:

The overall retirement confidence score dropped to 4.6 out of 10. This is down from a score of 6.9 out of 10 from the survey in 2023. Only 34% of respondents feel confident they have sufficient savings to live comfortably in retirement, while 60% expressed doubt about meeting their financial needs.

Saving Challenges:

39% of participants are not contributing to any pension
A fifth of respondents have not saved anything for retirement
Rising costs, such as housing and childcare, are major barriers to saving

Gender and Generational Disparities:

Women remain less confident than men about retirement prospects.
Confidence is highest among 18 – 24 year-olds and declines significantly among those aged 35 – 44

Perceived Income Needs vs. Reality:

Most adults believe they need £20,000-30,000 annually for a comfortable retirement, but this falls far short of the £43,100 estimated by the Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) for a “comfortable lifestyle”

Impact of Economic Conditions:

Public confidence has been affected by broader economic uncertainties, including the 2024 Autumn Budget. Over a quarter of respondents reported feeling less confident after its release

Calls for Systemic Change:

The report advocates for enhanced financial education, early savings plans, and systemic reforms to improve retirement preparedness
These findings underscore the urgency of early financial planning and seeking quality advice to secure a stable retirement future

Where do we come in?

Our aim is to give you the confidence that you need to enjoy retirement by planning ahead and helping you to put appropriate provisions in place, giving you the freedom to go ahead and live the lifestyle of your choosing once you ‘hang up your boots’.

As advisers, we are also keen that both parties in a couple are present and engaged in the planning process. This is just one way that we can help to bridge the gender gap, which the Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index unfortunately revealed remains present. This helps to provide the full picture, gives clarity to all involved and enables both members of a couple to educate themselves on the options that they have.

Lastly, we strive to look after families up and down the generations. As mentioned above, the 35 – 44 age group was found to have some of the lowest confidence levels when considering their retirement outlook. At that point in life, retirement may seem (and probably is) some way off. However, the earlier plans are put into place, the longer they have to cultivate and grow into something robust. If your child or grandchild is in this age group and you think that they would benefit from a conversation with us, please do get in touch.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024 Jemima Thomas2025-01-21T15:50:46+00:00

Government Pension Reforms

Matt Loadwick
Dec 2024 • 5 min read

Government Pension Reforms

Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently announced plans for major reforms to UK pension schemes, described as “the biggest pension reform in decades”, with possible implications for both UK public sector pension funds and private sector pensions.

These plans formed a key part of her first Mansion House speech as Chancellor, which is the annual address given by the incumbent Chancellor to senior bankers and financial industry leaders at the Annual Financial and Professional Services Dinner.

Typically, this speech is used to indicate future plans for the industry and is closely watched by those wanting to keep a close eye on the Government’s next steps.

What is the Government trying to achieve?

Through these reforms, it seems that the Government is seeking to achieve two objectives in particular;

To increase investment in UK projects / businesses to help stimulate economic growth; and
To increase returns on savings for UK pensioners

It is understood that the Government will not mandate where the funds will be invested, but it is hoped that a significant proportion will naturally end up invested in UK-based projects and growing businesses.

Some savers may find the framing of these reforms unsettling, as in the first instance they appear to be promoted as a vehicle for economic growth, rather than looking primarily at the needs of savers.

What are the plans?

According to the official Government press release, the reforms, (which will be introduced through a new Pension Schemes Bill in 2025) will merge the 86 Local Government Pension Scheme assets, and consolidate defined contribution schemes into ‘megafunds’.

It is understood that smaller defined contribution schemes from private businesses across the UK would also be pooled into funds of £25bn to £50bn

These megafunds would reflect set-ups in Australia and Canada, where pension funds take advantage of size to invest in assets that have higher growth potential. The Government hopes that this could deliver £80 million of investment in new businesses and critical infrastructure, while boosting the pension pots of defined contribution savers.

Are these new ideas?

It should be clarified that these plans are not exactly ‘new’ ideas from a UK government perspective, with the previous Conservative Governments proposing similar reforms in the last decade, most notably so with David Cameron in 2015, and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt as recently as Autumn 2023. It would seem that the fact that these reforms have cross-party support, at a time when UK politics is increasingly polarised, this would suggest that this is not altogether a terrible idea.

What opportunities might Megafunds offer?

The idea is that the larger the fund, the larger the sums of money that can be invested, into a wider range of both higher risk and longer-term assets, increasing the chances of improved returns for savers.

These pooled funds would be managed by professional investors, which should in turn help to cut costs by reducing fees paid to the various teams of advisers / lawyers / asset managers employed by individual firms each year.

What are the issues?

Risk and reward is inherent in all investments, and any investment decision should be defined through the investor’s attitude to risk, capacity for loss, and their need for returns.

Pension savers across the UK will all wish to see good returns on their investments in order to support a comfortable retirement, and in this regard the proposed reforms could be seen as a positive move.

However, not all savers will have the same attitude to risk, and an individual’s capacity for loss on their pension funds will change throughout their working lives. For instance, a saver in the early part of their career would be more likely to accept their funds taking a significant hit, as there would be plenty of time for them to recover before they retire. Conversely, a saver who may be looking to retire imminently would have less capacity for loss, as there would be less time for their funds to recover in the event of any significant losses.

These Canadian / Australian models often have a higher proportion of their funds invested in higher risk assets such as private equity, with a lower proportion held in assets that are typically less volatile, such as Government bonds or shares in listed companies.

Such investments come with particular risks, that not all savers have an appetite for. A key example of such investments going wrong is the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Scheme, who invested into utility provider Thames Water. Well-documented financial issues have led the pension fund to reduce the value of its 31.7% stake in the parent company of Thames Water to zero.

Undoubtedly, there will also be plenty of examples of success stories of these funds, whereby investments into higher risk assets provide the returns that investors hoped they would. But given the nature of our news and media cycle, which tends to focus on the negative, we are less likely to hear about such stories.

Implications?

As ever with these things, the devil will be in the detail, and given that the Bill will not be officially introduced to Parliament until next year, there is time for some of this detail to change.

Solomon’s will be on hand to support all our clients through whatever comes of these reforms; so if you have any questions or concerns – please let us know.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Government Pension ReformsJemima Thomas2025-01-21T15:02:04+00:00

Recycling: The possibilities are not endless

Daniel Liddicott
Aug 2024 • 3 min read

Recycling: The possibilities are not endless

There has been a great deal of speculation on potential changes to pension rules, amongst others, as we lead up to Labour’s Autumn Budget on 30^th October. However, one rule that we do not expect to change is the ability to take 25% of your pension pot as a tax-free lump sum.

Whilst Sir Keir Starmer did insinuate during the pre-election process that this current tax-free cash entitlement may not be safe from alteration, it was fairly swiftly followed by various Labour spokespeople claiming that this was “an old-fashioned mistake”. It does not appear therefore that this will change – after all, removing the 25% tax-free lump sum entitlement from pensions would be something akin to political suicide.

So, with this likely to remain for the foreseeable future, it is a good time to remind you of the rules on ‘recycling’ the tax-free cash from your pensions. Recycling in this instance is the act of paying any tax-free cash taken from your pension back into the same or another pension in order to benefit from additional tax relief. There are rules in place to prevent people from exploiting this loophole; otherwise it would be possible to repeatedly withdraw tax-free money from a pension and reinvest it to unfairly boost your pension savings.

When might you break pension tax-free cash recycling rules?

In order to break these recycling rules, ALL of the following must have occurred:

You must have received tax-free cash from a pension
Received more than £7,500 in tax-free cash over 12 months
As a result, pension contributions must have increased by more than 30% of what was expected (e.g., you paid in £10,000 each year before and are now paying in more than £13,000)
The additional amount you are contributing must be more than 30% of the tax-free lump sum received (e.g., you received £30,000 in tax-free cash and are now paying £9,000 or more into pensions)
The recycling was pre-planned

If only one of the above did not occur, you will not have been deemed to have broken the rules.

If all five points had occurred, you will have been deemed to have broken these rules and would likely be forced to pay tax on what would have otherwise been a tax-free lump sum.

In reality, it is not easy to hit all of the above criteria and break the recycling rules. However, it is useful to be aware of these rules to help to avoid paying unnecessary tax on those precious tax-free lump sums from your pensions. We are also, of course, here to help you to avoid such pitfalls. Please get in touch should you have any concerns about the above.

In direct contrast to, and to paraphrase a national TV advertisement campaign from the early 2000s, the message here is this – “Recycling: The possibilities are not endless.”

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Recycling: The possibilities are not endlessJemima Thomas2024-08-23T16:20:43+01:00

ISA ISA, Baby

Daniel Liddicott
April 2024 • 2 min read

ISA ISA, Baby

It came to our attention recently, after a number of queries, that there may be some confusion around when an ISA provides interest and when it provides investment returns. If you are unsure or have been wondering about this yourself, then I hope that this short blog is of interest to you (pun intended, of course).

Cash ISAs produce interest. Stocks & Shares ISAs provide investment returns.

Most Cash ISA providers are able to tell you ‘up front’ what your interest rate will be. In contrast to this, the growth rate in a Stocks & Shares ISA is not known at the outset – it’s only by looking back at performance that you know what it has been over a period of time.

All ISAs that are held by our clients on the Nucleus or Fundment platforms are Stocks & Shares ISAs and, as the name suggests, the funds held within these are invested in stocks/equity. Therefore, these provide investment returns, unlike their Cash ISA counterparts.

We have also received some queries about the investment term for ISAs. For Stocks & Shares ISAs, it is essentially however long you are willing to leave the funds invested for. And the longer the better! This way, you give your investments time to recover from all of the expected fluctuations in value that the stock market is subject to, providing the prospect for real growth of your ISA funds over the longer term.

Cash ISAs do often come with a particular term attached and, as a general rule, the longer you are willing to leave your money ‘locked away’ in one of these ISAs, the better the interest rate that you will be able to obtain.

As an example, you might opt to place your funds into a Cash ISA with Nationwide for the fixed term of one year, with the agreement that Nationwide will pay you a certain amount of interest over that time period. The interest that you receive on the one-year fixed term is highly likely to be greater than if you were to opt for an ISA that you can dip in and out of as you please without any restrictions.

If you would like to read a more detailed blog on ISAs, you might find this helpful:

What is an ISA?

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

ISA ISA, BabyJemima Thomas2025-01-28T10:04:09+00:00

The Rising

Dominic Thomas
October 2023 • 3 min read

The rising

We have all been aware that prices have been rising, some rather more than the officially stated rate of inflation (are they kidding?). You are equally likely to be aware that interest rates on cash deposits have been slowly creeping up, reflecting the Bank of England lending rates. Most of the Banks and Building Societies were shamed into increasing rates by the regulator, the financial cartel has slowly limped to improvement in their offerings. At the time of writing, global equity markets are up about 7.28% over 12 months or 9.96% since the start of 2023.

This has also meant an increase in annuity rates, which are a fair bit higher than 12 months ago. Annuity rates are based on life expectancy and economic conditions, notably interest rates. For example, over the last year, according to Standard Life, annuities are up about 20%. However a little warning about the statement, there is a sense of ‘if only’ about these sorts of things…

If you were quoted for an annuity last year at age 65 (for example) you would be 66 now. As a result your annuity quote would be more anyway due to the fact that you are a year older. The older you are the better the deal, because it’s about your life expectancy (how much is left of it).

If you had bought an annuity last year at the prevailing rates, you may be a little miffed, as most of them do not increase with inflation each year. In simple terms you use a pension fund (usually) to buy a fixed income for life. This is either just in your name or with a spouse benefit (the income will continue at the same level or a lower amount each year). When the annuitant dies, generally the annuity stops, unless there is a spouse benefit or a special guarantee has been bought (so would pay the estate). You can certainly have an increasing annuity, but normally at fixed terms of 3% or 5% at the most. However these are costly and tend to be much lower, typically taking 12 years to catch up before actually paying more each month than a level annuity.

Let’s suppose you have £100,000 and are 65 – a single life, level annuity would provide about £7,462 a year (roughly). If you had been born a year earlier and turned 65 in 2022, you would have an annuity paying around £6,218 a year. This is nothing to do with investments performance, but everything to do with interest rates. Over time, that difference becomes more significant the longer you live.

The other odd thing about annuities is that if you are not in great medical shape, you may well qualify for an enhanced annuity, perhaps 30%-40% more. This is due to the expectation that your life will be shorter than average.

So had you waited you would be able to get a bigger annuity, if your health had worsened you would have a better annuity, if your spouse had died, you would get a better annuity. All pretty grim really. These are all things that we cannot predict, other than that you age. It’s also why we ask you about your health and plans. These are not insignificant issues. Let’s talk about them.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

The RisingJemima Thomas2025-01-21T15:49:31+00:00

Lost pensions

Dominic Thomas
July 2023 • 8 min read

Lost pensions

The world of pensions is ever changing, a phrase that three decades ago I thought could never be uttered with a straight face, such was my naivety. The last three decades have seen a vast amount of change which has left most of us attempting to follow a paper trail of who took over who, a bit of head scratching, trying to remember who took over Clerical Medical or Friends Provident, Sun Life, Equity and Law, Norwich Union and hundreds of others.

KNOW YOUR EAGLE STAR FROM YOUR COMMERCIAL UNION

Today, the pension provider landscape looks nothing like it did. Indeed, traditional pension companies have largely disappeared or sold their legacy of pension funds to someone else. This has often not been a spectacular success, with constant promises that you (and we) are important, but evidently not important enough to answer the phone before a change of Chancellor.

1 IN 4 PEOPLE HAVE LOST A PENSION

Add in the regular movement of investors as their careers unfold and you have such a mess that not even an angry teenager’s bedroom would surpass. A recent survey (warning with them all about extracting data from a small sample to 66m people, but that said..) showed that 1 in 4 people believe that they have a missing or lost pension. I’m a little surprised it isn’t a higher proportion.

There are a multitude of small pots of pension benefits, sometimes pennies but sometimes thousands of pounds. Many of you may remember “contracting out of SERPS” in the late 1980s or early 90’s… some of these pensions have had several decades of growth and worth a princely sum. It is certainly worth checking.

PROCRASTINATION WILL COST YOU INCOME

Too regularly good intentions to “sort out my pensions” is deferred until a better time. I understand this very normal reality but it carries a cost. A lot of old pensions are very expensive by today’s standards and those charges are eating away at returns. Then of course, there is the issue of the returns themselves – are the funds appropriate, suitable to your long-term ambitions?

The good news is that even the Government have a service for lost pensions. You can find the link in our conveniently entitled “useful links” page – Lost Policy Finder. Of course, if you already have the details and they are sitting in a drawer somewhere, send us a copy so that we can assess it for you, don’t leave it until you take your retirement more seriously, we want to help you avoid using the phrase “if only I had got this to you earlier”.

GETTING READY FOR RETIREMENT… THE SOONER THE BETTER

As a not very aside, side note…. Do also have a go at our “Retirement Ready?” quiz if you are yet to retire, and please SHARE this information with people you care about, helping everyone to become more financially informed as well as financially independent, is one of our reasons for being here.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Lost pensionsJemima Thomas2023-12-01T12:12:30+00:00

Is it time to give up driving Miss Daisy?

Dominic Thomas
July 2023 • 8 min read

Is it time to give up driving Miss Daisy?

Amongst the showers that interrupted the tennis, I spotted a piece on the BBC news site. The clickbait that caught my eye “People should plan retirement from driving”. The article is about families challenging the older generation with a question about their ability to drive. Pause on that for a moment. I once heard a joke that basically said that the two things you cannot criticize anyone for are their sexual prowess and their driving. In fact, the offence to challenge either appears almost equally and deeply hurtful.

The latest attempt by the regulator to ensure the right things are being done, (without being too obviously a new lick of paint such as FSA to FCA) is called “Consumer Duty”. A large element of this is about vulnerability. In short, are you more likely to misunderstand advice or be “taken advantage of” because you are either temporarily or permanently “vulnerable”. The term is of course open to interpretation, the intention though is very well meaning.

However, such discussions are rarely easy. Imagine being told that you are no longer fit to drive. So many of us cherish our independence, which is what our ability to drive represents. Indeed if you live in a rural area, your car may be your practical connection to wider society. Yet getting this wrong (which likely means a serious accident happened) will have devastating impact. There is a huge risk of causing offence, appearing patronising or controlling, yet this is “for your own good”.

So how will you know when it is time?

I have been struck by the wisdom of several of our older clients. Two incidents stand out. The first had the foresight to not simply visit local care homes, but she booked herself in for a week or so to see what the level of care was like. She wasn’t impressed and made other arrangements. The second possesses a grasp of self-awareness and a wisdom that I hope I achieve. He knew that at some point he wouldn’t know what he didn’t know. If that sounds a little Donald Rumsfeld, its intended. In short, he wanted me to take over the reigns so that his affairs remain in top notch condition.

Most of us are reluctant to become reliant on others. We generally place very high value on our own ability to make our own choices, we also have a tendency for overconfidence in our own abilities. Ask a room of people to raise their hand if they consider themselves a “better than average driver” the majority will raise their hand, which of course statistically doesn’t hold with logic. The majority cannot be above average.

So in our planning for you, we will increasingly be faced with ever more difficult conversations as we all age about how we protect ourselves from ourselves. Our role is to speak truth and consider your future in the context of all we understand. The BBC article is a sobering reminder that we cannot ignore things simply because it may offend.

Currently your driving license expires when you reach age 70. You retain the right to renew. I remember a short film by David Ackerman starring John Cleese called “Taking the Wheel” (2002) which is an amusing take on why his 90-year-old-mother refused to give up driving.

BBC ARTICLE

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Is it time to give up driving Miss Daisy?Jemima Thomas2025-01-23T10:54:22+00:00

Golden handcuffs

Dominic Thomas
Jan 2023 • 6 min read

Golden handcuffs…

For many employees, a key reason to remain with their employer is because of pension benefits, however the playing field of employer pension schemes is far from level and the cynic in me questions whether Government tax policy is deliberately attempting to reduce the cost of pensions to employers, particularly the State employers such as the NHS.

Firstly, it’s important to understand the two basic types of pension. The clue to what they are is in the unusually straight-forward name.

1 – Defined Benefit (DB) or Final Salary Scheme

Your pension (benefit) is based on your final salary when you leave the scheme, whenever that is at the scheme normal retirement date (NRD).

The amount you get is a fraction of your final salary, your membership of the scheme and work for the employer builds your entitlement. So a scheme with a 1/60th rate of “Accrual” 25 years of membership would provide 25/60ths (41.6%) of your final salary. This will be inflation-linked within parameters set by the scheme.

The amount you receive has nothing to do with how much you contribute, that can be any amount (sometimes nothing). It is your employers duty to honour the agreement not simply for the remainder of your life but likely the remainder of your spouse’s life as well.

According to ONS data to 2019 (the most recent at the time of writing) there are about 7.6m active members (people still building benefits) of DB schemes, of these 6.6m are in Public Sector schemes.

2 – Defined Contribution (DC) or Money Purchase Scheme

These schemes are more straightforward in that they are investment-based schemes and the only guaranteed definitions are how much the employer is going to contribute as a percentage of pensionable salary (and the employee). How much this is ultimately worth will depend on how well the money is invested and the charges applied. Many employers use fairly cautious investment strategies in the misguided belief that this is better, yet as most people will save for their retirement for three or four decades, this will be rather like driving with the handbrake on.

The Auto Enrolment pensions that were introduced to automatically add staff to a pension rather than ask them if they wanted to join are essentially defined contribution schemes. They have been a success in the sense that more people are now saving into a pension.

The majority of employers do not offer a DB scheme, in fact hundreds have been closed over the years. There are barely any open DB schemes in the private sector, because they cost an awful lot to run and provide. There are roughly 10.4m people drawing a pension from a DB scheme and it’s fairly evenly split between private and public sector pensions. Remember that these are pensions payable for many years with a degree of inflation-proofing. Back in 2006 there were about 3m members of private sector DB schemes, half of them were closed, but by 2019 only 0.6m members were actively building benefits due to the number of closed schemes, deemed too expensive. Contrast this to the 0.9m members of open private sector DC schemes in 2006 which has risen to a whopping 10.6m.

To put a little more ‘flesh on the bones’ of the open private sector DB schemes, employers contribute a weighted average of 19.1% with employees adding a further 6.5%. Compare this to the weighted average private sector DC scheme where employers contribute 3.5% and employees just 1.6%. It doesn’t take a maths genius to work out that its much cheaper (by a country mile) for employers to provide a DC scheme, for which they pay annual contributions when their member of staff works for them and not a penny more thereafter.

Stating the obvious, if you are running any business, profit is what sustains a future; reducing costs increases profits (or should). The Public Sector cannot generally make quick and substantial changes like this. Generally the approach has been to alter existing DB schemes, with pensions starting later (65, 67, 68 as opposed to 60). Member employee contribution rates have increased – doubling in many cases. Finally, the rate of accrual has also been changed, often dressed up as better, but invariably forfeiting other benefits such as a lump sum. This is where most Union and legal challenges have been directed.

So taking a typical doctor who began their career paying 6% into a 1/80th pension scheme that would provide a pension for life from age 60 and a one-off tax-free lump sum. If they started working without any career breaks they might build 36 years of service (36/80ths) providing a 45% pension of their final salary (say £130,000) of £58,500 a year and a one off lump sum of £175,500.

If we exclude inflation, a same salary doctor will need to work an extra 7 years to get their pension at 67. They pay closer to 13.5% of salary to the pension and build it as 43/54ths of 79% of their salary (no lump sum)… but the Government was smarter than that, the maths isn’t really 1/54th of final salary, it’s of each year … the term ‘career average earnings’ captures this. A doctor starting out is obviously paid substantially less than one at the peak of their expertise and career earnings – so it’s nothing like a final salary but an average salary over 43 years. Taking the midpoint as an example, 21 years into a career – or retiring on a salary that you had 21 years ago. In fairness it isn’t quite like that, there is some inflation-linking, but this is detail you don’t need to know right now. The principle is how pensions in the Public Sector have been sliced and diced to save money.

When you add in draconian Government/HMRC rules about the Lifetime Allowance (a tax charge of 25% or 55% for those with pensions valued at over £1,073,100 and the Annual Allowance formula used, (which for many triggers a substantial tax on a pension income they have not yet had), it is very hard to conclude anything other than a deliberate strategy to remove higher paid long-term employees … like doctors.

So quite apart from the awful treatment medics often get in the media and utterly fictional suggestions of Consultants barely breaking from a round of golf to turn up for work occasionally, there is little wonder that most of them feel betrayed by a nation that they chose to serve. I can certainly tell you that from three decades of working with NHS doctors, I’ve not met any that became multi-millionaires through their work within healthcare. Some are certainly more entrepreneurial than others, but most of them simply love medicine and get satisfaction making a real difference in people’s lives, more likely describing it as a ‘calling’.

The reasons for the NHS being in crisis are complex and many, but part of the reason is that many doctors are being forced to reduce the number of sessions that they work or retire early so as to avoid a scenario where they are essentially paying more tax than the income they earn … actually paying to work. It is down to the Government and policymakers to have an adult approach to pensions and scrapping many of the really very badly thought through self-defeating rules.

You can read more articles about Pensions, Wealth Management, Retirement, Investments, Financial Planning and Estate Planning on my blog which gets updated every week. If you would like to talk to me about your personal wealth planning and how we can make you stay wealthier for longer then please get in touch by calling 08000 736 273 or email [email protected]

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Golden handcuffsJemima Thomas2023-12-01T12:12:39+00:00

Changing of the guard

Dominic Thomas
Dec 2022 • 5 min read

Changing of the guard

I know that football isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but it often provides useful metaphors. Whether you love or loathe it, I suspect that you have heard the name Cristiano Ronaldo, who is one of the sport’s true superstars, with a career that has made him extraordinarily wealthy as his prolific goalscoring has resulted in team successes and trophies. At the age of 37 he is representing Portugal at his fifth World Cup (starting in 2006). His latest contract pays him £26m a year.

Yet on Tuesday evening, he was left ‘on the bench’ and watched as his team beat the Swiss 6-1 with a hat-trick from his replacement, Ramos some 20 years his junior. Few of us will contemplate retirement at 37, but in sporting terms, that is ‘getting on a bit’. Ronaldo and his many millions of admirers will have mixed feelings about seeing someone else take centre stage and provide an extremely good performance that threatens the possibility of Ronaldo’s normally guaranteed place in the starting line-up for the next match against Morocco on Saturday for a place in the semi-final. Those who know football, will observe that this is a normal experience for all players but rare for the superstars of the sport, but something that Ronaldo has only recently begun to experience at his club (or no longer his club).

PLAN, PURPOSE, PREPARATION

There is no obvious way to prepare for retirement, for some it is a very sudden change of pace and evokes questions about purpose and meaning, for others there is a sense of relief, as though a great burden has been lifted. A recent webinar presented by researchers from academia, has found that most retirees are not very well prepared for the transition. Whilst finance and having enough money is a significant element of retirement, it certainly isn’t the sole consideration.

Researchers found that most people do not consider how a change in health may create problems where they live, if they are unable to drive, use public transport or have a hospital reasonably nearby. They also pointed to the underappreciation of social contact and community and how a once pleasant ‘get away from it all’ location becomes increasingly isolated from valuable personal connection.

One question that seems to be understood and answered differently in different countries is “when does middle age end? And when does old age begin?”. This reminded me of a clip that I saw recently in which it was argued ‘middle aged’ is between 35-50, being typically the mid-point in most people’s lives…

65 IS THE NEW 45…

Often, we hear “you are as old as you feel” I’m not convinced by that, but I do think having connections, community involvement, friends and family all help make life invigorated and outward looking. Pop star, material girl, Madonna will turn 65 in August 2023 (next summer) and if she had been a UK resident for long enough, paying her NI, would be eligible for her State Pension in 2024.

As for people who have already turned 65 in 2022 – Stephen Fry, Jo Brand, Nick Faldo, Jayne Torvill, Frank Skinner, Timothy Spall, Daniel Day Lewis, Siouxise Sioux, Fern Britton, Dawn French, Billy Bragg and Steve Davis are all part of the cohort that will collect their State Pension at 66 in 2023. As for Ronaldo, if he was eligible to claim a UK State Pension, under current rules he could do so when he is 68, which is in 2053, some thirty years time during which he would see a further seven World Cup tournaments.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Changing of the guardJemima Thomas2025-01-21T15:50:46+00:00

Previous 123 Next