BUDGETS & FINANCIAL NEWS Archives - Financial Planning in Surrey

PENSION DEADLINE – YOUR STATE PENSION

Dominic Thomas
March 2025 • 3 min read

PENSION DEADLINE – YOUR STATE PENSION

I’ve had a few enquiries from people who have seen something in the news but aren’t clear about what it is. There is a sense of urgency and the information seems to be coming from reliable sites, so what is it?

‘BOOST’ YOUR PENSION

The tax year ends on 5^th April 2025 a few weeks away now. This is a deadline for people who wish to make up (backfill if you will) missing or incomplete years of national insurance contributions. The timeframe is closing, it’s a use it or lose it situation.

Why would you?

Firstly, this only applies to people under State Pension Age (SPA). To get a full State Pension, you need 35 years of National Insurance contributions, which for the record, technically can begin when you are 16 until you are 67 or older. So most people will have a ‘working career’ of 51 years to build 35.

If you have had breaks in your employment (maternity, child care, working abroad, redundancy, sickness) then you will likely find that you don’t have a full record. So on the assumption (red flag) that you work and pay NI until your State Pension Age, then you can estimate how many years you will have.

If you build more than 35 years, you do not get a bigger pension.

Time is Running Out

Until 5^th April 2025 you can buy the missing years (for a price) all the way back to 2006. Once the new tax year starts, you will only be able to make up incomplete years in the last six tax years.

You are smart enough to know that ‘the system’ is under some strain, so getting the data and paying for the missed years is going to be arduous.

So the first thing to do is check your NI record. You get a list of every tax year since you were 16 (fairly enlightening as an experience). If you spot missing years, perhaps there has been an error? If not, then estimate how many more full tax years you are likely to work for yourself or someone else until State Pension age.

WARNING: Estimating Your Lifetime

You have to give this some thought, a State Pension pays out for your lifetime, so if you die before getting one, well, that’s lost. As a warning, from both experience and research, most people underestimate how long they will live, so beware of that. You may also have a condition that shortens your life expectancy. So to pretend that this is an easy calculation is misleading.

The State Pension is very good value, it provides a guaranteed income for life, it is taxable but for most will fall within the current personal allowance for 0% tax.

Check your NI record, get a State Pension forecast – but remember that they assume you work until your State Pension age. Whilst you are there check the date of when that is for you. You can find the links in our resources section or start by clicking here.

Link to your NI records: https://www.gov.uk/check-national-insurance-record

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

PENSION DEADLINE – YOUR STATE PENSIONJemima Thomas2025-03-07T16:05:43+00:00

Geopolitics and Market Volatility

Matt Loadwick
Feb 2025 • 3 min read

Geopolitics and Market Volatility

The stability, or otherwise, and volatility of global stock markets can be affected by a number of factors, which can be both economic and political in nature. In terms of economic factors, both UK and US economies are currently experiencing well-documented inflation, the result of rising costs of goods and services. This leads to increased borrowing costs, and to market uncertainty, as investors get spooked by high costs, and have a tendency to wait for prices to drop before investing.

In the UK, a glimmer of light appeared when the rate of inflation dropped by 0.1% in December compared to November, easing the pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves, and going some way to improve market confidence as the odds increase of the Bank of England reducing interest rates early this year. That said, it does feel like the current news cycle in the UK will provide reasons to be cheerful one day, followed by reasons to despair on the following, fuelling further volatility as markets react.

Global stock markets are also influenced by geopolitical events, where often the unpredictability surrounding such events can lead to increased volatility. As an example, the Russian invasion of Ukraine resulted in firms that had strong ties to Russia experiencing a significant fall in share prices.

It is also worth pointing out that politics and economics clearly do not exist in a vacuum, with both influencing each other symbiotically – as politicians drive their economic agenda, markets respond accordingly depending on the success (or otherwise) of their policies …

As the 47^th President of the United States was sworn in for the second time earlier in January, the world is braced for increasing geopolitical uncertainty with a Trump administration once again at the helm. Indeed, they have taken little time to give us a taste of what is to come over the next four years, creating headlines through divisive policies, such as the proposed mass deportations of illegal immigrants, withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement (compounded by plans to increase drilling for oil to promote as a key US export), pardoning the circa 1,500 Trump supporters who were charged over the 2021 US Capitol riots, and far-fetched rumours (we hope) of an interest in invading Greenland.

Such examples certainly give the impression that this administration may cause something of ‘a bumpy ride’ for markets in the coming years, particularly in the context of ongoing conflicts in the Middle-East and Ukraine. This is reflected in research undertaken by Scottish Widows, which suggests that geopolitics and volatility are likely to be among the top concerns for advisers in 2025.

If at some point you were to watch the value of your investments take a temporary drop, it is only human nature to feel a sense of nervousness. In the face of this expected volatility, we at Solomon’s are here as ever to encourage calm, and to ensure that our clients do not lose sight of the importance of planning for the long term.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Geopolitics and Market VolatilityJemima Thomas2025-02-10T10:02:08+00:00

Autumn 2024 Budget

Dominic Thomas
Oct 2024 • 5 min read

The Autumn 2024 Budget

I expect further analysis to be necessary, here are some of the initial Autumn Budget highlights. I think firstly there is some good news. The tax-free cash from pensions has not been abolished (I didn’t think it would be).

The Taxman on Steroids

Whatever your political persuasion, the Government is raising an extra £40bn and raising an estimated £1,229bn in 2025-26. One might conclude that all the fuss amounts to a total increase of 3.3% which isn’t that far off the rate of inflation. This merely fuels my general, (admittedly cynical) belief that a Budget is a bit like rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. Is ‘the system’ fixed? and will it benefit the nation? are always the questions without answer.

What we do know is that Labour are going to ramp up tax collecting, which in truth is probably a continuance of previous Conservative policy. By the end of November 2024 there will be 200 new HMRC compliance staff, with the intention of creating 5,000 new compliance jobs at HMRC. This is part of the strategy to collect more of the unpaid tax (tax gap) that is owed. HMRC are also launching an app for your phone. HMRC do have powers that enable them to take money from your account and I would expect to see more of this sort of thing occur for frequent late payers.

Similarly, Labour will be aggressively going after those who cheat the welfare state, with fairly tough consequences for those who are caught.

Inheritance Tax

Agricultural property relief and business property relief will alter from April 2026. These will retain 100% relief from inheritance tax up to £1m but thereafter be subject to a 20% inheritance tax rate (half the actual rate). So this is probably a better result than many feared, but there cannot be many agricultural properties worth much below £1m. The reduced IHT exemption will also apply to AIM shares (a commonly used but very high risk tool used by some within the sector) which will inevitably now be less appealing.

Surprisingly, there has been some certainty provided in that the Nil Rate Band of £325,000 is now secured until 2030 as is the Main Residence Relief Rate of £175,000 for estates up to £2m. There is no inheritance tax between spouses.

Farmers will certainly be caught by the changes and I wonder if there may be an amendment for smaller farms (sub £5m in value). It isn’t a good idea to upset those who provide our food and rural management, but it is evident to many that some are considerably more prosperous than others and shouldn’t be totally exempt from IHT.

Pensions

Sadly but not unexpectedly, your unused pension pots will begin to be part of IHT assessment for anyone who dies after 5^th April 2027. Currently, unused pension pots are exempt from IHT, but this will end in two and bit years time. This may change some strategies for leaving your pension pot as long as you can, but we have time to make adjustments if necessary. This slight change in policy was always expected and remains one of the many reasons for keeping your retirement provision under review.

The truth is that this will create more administration for Probate which will likely increase the time that the process takes. It is also yet another opportunity for HMRC to learn the value of your pension assets.

Tax-free cash on pensions remains as it was, as does the tax relief on contributions (the latter being a surprise to me). As ever, it rather suggests that you really shouldn’t listen to ‘news’ reports, which are sadly driven by ideology rather than actual facts.

I cannot find anything about changes to Lifetime Allowance, Annual Allowance or Small Pensions rules in the 164 pages of the report. Indeed, it is confirmed that there are no other changes to existing pension rules and allowances, except for offshore pensions, which you do not have anyway! This impacts QROPS (if you know, you know, but you don’t need to if you don’t!).

ISAs

There were no changes to the ISA, LISA or JISA rules and allowances, despite what media pundits suggested. Clearly use of these allowances is sensible, don’t waste yours. The one thing they have scrapped is the British ISA which was announced but never implemented. I think it best assumed that this was a flag-waving attempt for the election.

Non-Dom

Nothing to do with me, but non-domiciled. The rules are changing with the intention being to ensure that people who live in the UK pay their taxes in the UK, both whilst alive and deceased. So this impacts people born outside of the UK. Ultimately, if you have made the UK your home then your worldwide assets will be liable to UK inheritance taxes. Reading between the lines, this is really aimed at very wealthy people with jets and large yachts.

Capital Gains Tax

Capital Gains tax will rise for any disposals from Budget Day (deeply embedded on page 129) this will make our calculations particularly onerous for 2024/25. However, the increase is much as expected, though frankly still lower than I thought might be the case. CGT will increase to 18% (for basic rate taxpayers) and 24% (for higher and additional rate taxpayers). This is still less than income tax. This makes an even stronger case to ensure you use your ISA allowances (£20,000) where CGT does not apply.

There was no change to the CGT allowance of £3,000 – the gain you can make before paying the tax; also no changes to your ability to use realised losses as well

Allowances and rates

There was no change to the annual giving allowance, inheritance tax rates or allowances (other than the above exemptions). The tax bands remain frozen (as previously planned and expected). This means that more people will end up paying tax as they drift into higher tiers.

Business Owners

Arguably business owners (like me) were the ‘hardest hit’ in the Budget. Whilst employees may not pay more National Insurance, employers will collectively pay rather more, some £24bn more from the next tax year and beyond. The employer rate will rise from 13.8% to 15% and be paid from a lower starting level of £5,000 rather than £9,100 (this alone is an extra £615 a year). However small businesses do get Employment Allowance, so the calculated NI they pay only applies after £5,000, this is extended to £10,500 from the new tax year and will apply to all businesses.

This is going to make salary sacrifice schemes more appealing for employers, but I wonder if they might otherwise be even more circumspect about new appointments. This also prompts thoughts about bonuses and pay rises being paid into pensions rather than as salary.

If you do own your own business, then the first £1m you get from selling it has a reduced capital gains tax rate (10%); gains above this are at normal CGT rates. This is known as Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) and Investors Relief. The £1m allowance will persist but the rates will increase to 14% for 25/26 and 18% for 26/27. So if you were planning to sell or close your business you probably don’t have enough time to take advantage of the lower rate. In practice the extra tax is no more than £40,000 in 25/26 then £80,000 from 26/27.

Business rates (the council tax businesses pay for having an office, shop or factory without any right to local vote or waste disposal) are going to rise. The temporary discount of 75% on rates expires in April and will become a 40% discount.

Corporation tax will remain at the same rate (25%) – that’s business profit taxed at 25% before the balance is distributed as dividends (which are also taxed). The small business rate (profits under £250,000) is retained at 19%, but is of course reduced in real terms (which is what politicians mean by retained or frozen).

Families With Young Children

For those of you with children and are paying for private education or plan to do so, VAT will now be added to your invoice (20%). You may also find that the fees increase as Public Schools will not be able to claim rates relief.

Child benefit rules are remaining as they were. Long gone are the days when families collected child benefit for each child, irrespective of income or need. Today the benefit is withdrawn (or more accurately must be repaid) if the higher earner’s income tops £80,000 (High Income Child Benefit Charge). The one change is that this can now be resolved through the PAYE system rather than dealing with self-assessment returns which invariably are forgotten by employees – leading to fines.

Helping First Time Buyers

There is little attempt to help any first time buyers in the south of the country. The Stamp Duty Land Tax (Stamp Duty), currently has a threshold of £425,000 before SDLT is paid. This is going to be reduced to £300,000. So First Time Buyers and indeed anyone, will now pay more tax when purchasing a home, so make sure it’s the right location, location, location. Those buying a second property (not their main residence) will see SDLT increase further.

There was noise about building homes and allowing councils to keep funds from sale of council houses under the Right to Buy scheme, which it is hoped will aid the housing market crisis of overpriced and not enough. Perhaps the extra tax on pensions may result in more beneficiaries selling inherited homes as well.

Specifics and Personal – Get In Touch

Of course, more detail may be needed for your specific personal situation, but these are the main headlines. I think most of us know that Government like to tax fuel, alcohol and cigarettes. Your green holiday flight tax will also rise by £2 for economy. If you go by private jet, the levy will increase by 50%. Reeves rather pointedly glared at Sunak as she gave an example of a flight to California.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Autumn 2024 BudgetJemima Thomas2025-01-23T10:49:36+00:00

Contract for difference?

Dominic Thomas
Oct 2024 • 3 min read

Contract for difference?

I’m going to be blunt. If you come across a Contract for Difference (CFD) or more accurately someone trying to sell you one, run.

A CFD is a highly complex financial instrument. I’m not going to bore you with the detail. You can see it here if you wish: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/contractfordifferences.asp. Anyway, as is often the case, a man in a smart suit or sounding like he probably owns several of them from Savile Row (showing my age) is to be avoided. For good measure, I’d suggest that Forex (foreign exchange trading) when combined with ‘investment advice’ would also be best left well alone. Unless of course you quite like losing your life savings – which I know you don’t.

So, with the regularity of a tax year, news of yet another FCA fine to such a shark graces my inbox. This time the fine was slashed by over 75% from £1,215,000 to just £276,100 (well it is ‘just’ for a firm like that). The firm being Forex TB Limited (FXTB). This is for giving investment advice when they have no permission or right to do so. The fine was slashed as it would mean FXTB would face financial hardship. I would have thought the sector would be better off without an unauthorised firm quite obviously not giving a fig about the rules. I certainly don’t wonder why my regulatory fees rise each year when the fines for the culprits are soft. Still, at least they don’t have a license and have held no FCA permissions since last October. What a relief.

FXTB appear to have been fairly standard financial crooks, at least that is my reading of the FCA statement, which I quote:

“FXTB pressured customers to put their money at risk through CFD trading, even encouraging them to borrow money from friends or family in some cases.

Compounding these failings, FXTB frequently provided its customers with investment advice, despite not being authorised to do so.

FXTB’s customers were inexperienced in trading and did not always understand the risks associated with CFDs, which were also not fully explained to them. FXTB also enabled customers to become ‘Professional Clients’ by encouraging them to provide false information. This meant these consumers lost the protections that as ‘retail clients’ they would have had.”

In short, there is enough risk and return available in normal mainstream investment funds without going off-piste into really nuanced trading techniques, and yes before you ask, I would include cryptocurrency in the same category until further notice.

You can read the full FCA statement here: https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-fxtb-unfair-customer-treatment-practices

OK, so you wouldn’t fall for this, after all you pay us to advise you – but what about your friends, family and peers; you know the ones you worry about that might very well get sucked into this sort of stuff. Introduce us.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Contract for difference?Jemima Thomas2024-10-21T10:44:08+01:00

Budget or canary? A Whimsical Reduction

Dominic Thomas
March 2024 • 5 min read

Budget or canary? A Whimsical Reduction

There was another Budget today, my inbox and the media interest will likely pass over the next 48 hours until a ‘howler’ is found in the sums. Unlike politicians, let me extend my neck … this was possibly the last Conservative budget for a while and an attempt to rescue votes that would otherwise slip away. It contained the traditional narrative of putting money back in your own pocket (having taken it) rather than asking you to reach a little deeper for more. Anyway the 98 pages of light reading provide a distraction …

Owners of commercial property will pay less capital gains tax, 4% less or a reduction of 14%, or 28% reducing to 24% for higher and additional rate taxpayers, depending on how you like your spin. Over the last decade we have all witnessed the decline of retailers and shopping centres, the pandemic added to their misery and extended it to the office sector which has gradually spun the dial on remote working whilst watching energy bills soar and staffing levels make the place feel like an episode from The Last of Us.

Employees and the self employed have had national insurance cut by 2%, the tax that doesn’t really build up for your pension, other than in a pay to play sense. This is not applied to employers who do the employing and of course pensioners at State Pension age or above do not pay national insurance but actually receive the State Pension.

Some sense is being finally applied to the Child Benefit system for ‘High Earning Families’ where previously only one person had to earn above £50,000 for the tapering of financial help to begin. This has been raised to £60,000 and will eventually be applied to household income rather than individuals (it was previously possible for a couple to earn £49,000 each and avoid any reductions). Sadly for most people the reality of juggling childcare and credits, whilst manipulating income is really a gigantic hassle merely to demonstrate that they qualify to not have to refund money that has already been spent.

Those working in the Public Sector are under constant scrutiny for their productivity by (forgive the Thomas the Tank Engine sounding terms) the National Statistician and Comptroller and Auditor General who assert that “tens of billions” can be saved through higher production and less fraud, better project management and better Government technology. How many tens is unclear, one might say there is a touch of Yes Minister as any tech project the Government designs and procures usually fails to work. The fraud checking might do well to exercise a little more vigor in relation to Pandemic VIP lanes and contracts.

There will be more nurses (well nursing and midwifery places) by 2031. So we should expect delays and pressure on our NHS for another seven years. Similarly, medical schools will be aiming to achieve 15,000 places in the same timeframe. Student digs around St George’s look set to thrive. Assuming entry to medical school is at 18 at the earliest, this is likely aimed at your bright 11-year-old who has not yet started secondary school. A hard sell to most 11-year-olds from generation alpha. There were about 778,803 live births in the UK in 2013, almost 2% of them are going to be doctors then, a fair chance they will be called Oliver or Amelia.

Now you see why we need the National Statistician who is also suggesting that doctors waste around 13million hours on poor IT. A BMA study found that only 4% of doctors believe that the IT they use is “completely adequate”. The Government of efficiency has been in power since 2010 … around the time of the iPhone 4, the pre-fibre days with speeds of up to 100Mbit/s. I imagine the plan to test AI to automate GP letters and discharge summaries will provide ample resource for comedians and there are assurances that it will not be called horayitzgon..

The need for yet another version of an ISA isn’t welcomed by me. It’s a little hallucinogenic, a nod to nostalgia, Blighty and Brexit whilst having its trace in the origins of the PEP (remember them – the Personal Equity Plan) which was originally restricted to UK shares. The new £5,000 UK ISA (in addition to your £20,000 ISA) must be held in UK equities. One for the purists, but also the mathematicians who will be able to encompass allocation to the UK of £5,000 within a portfolio, but making ‘models’ a challenge. Expect another acronym perhaps £UKISA?.

There will also be a British Bond (I’m not sure how that differs from any other one created by the UK Government) but anyhow a 3-year Bond will soon be making its way over the horizon, available from April at a Post Office near you, just don’t mention the subpostmasters.

Your petrol, beer and wine aren’t changing, though your consumption may. Actually, strictly speaking the tax rate isn’t changing, I suspect the price already has since this morning. The Chancellor believes that inflation will reduce, so expect interest rates to do the same.

The threshold for small businesses registering and collecting VAT for HMRC will increase from £85,000 of revenue to £90,000. One for the builders who have a different company name for every room of your house-build to navigate with a little more ease.

In the 98 pages I can find no change to the annual allowance for pensions or the main ISA, LISA, JISA. Let’s hope this is not an error, if it is we now know that Fujitsu can ~~‘remote in’~~ to make some changes. There is no change to the capital gains tax allowance which reduces to £3,000 on 06/04/24. There is no change to the personal allowance, income tax thresholds or tax rates … which is as expected, but of course means a reduction in tax allowances when measured against inflation or a tax increase depending on your flavour of politics. There is a change for inheritance tax, but only if you have married someone from outside the UK and it doesn’t apply until 2025.

There is a continued attempt to entice businesses to money launder – I mean list in London – with not a hint of tropical offshore waters with a scheme called PISCES (that’s Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System to you and I). Having also witnessed the decline in pension funds owning UK shares (some vote a while back about cheese and wine) by 6%, the Government continue to attempt to ‘buck the market’ (something no Thatcherite would ever do) by forcing pensions to hold an allocation in UK companies. Discussions with the FCA and Pensions Regulator are due to begin in the Spring (note the daffodils are already out). This is possibly to be combined with a ‘Value For Money’ pensions framework … something that all three bodies have, in theory, been overseeing already. Anyway … it would be remiss of me to fail to point out that it has been Government policy to reduce the Annual Allowance, introduce the tapered annual allowance, reduce the Lifetime Allowance, introduce the Money Purchase Annual Allowance and imposed HMRC calculations for all – aimed in fact to deliberately reduce the value of pensions since 2010 (at the time, the Lifetime Allowance was £1.8m, the annual allowance was capped at £255,000).

Above all, the Chancellor reaffirmed belief in owning property, particularly in Surrey, which is to become a fiefdom under the level 2 devolution agreement. This despite local councils being unable to balance their own books, or perhaps because of it?

Carry on.

References:

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Budget or canary? A Whimsical ReductionJemima Thomas2025-01-27T17:01:00+00:00

Last exit before…

Dominic Thomas
Jan 2024 • 7 min read

Last exit before…

As a minnow, I’m supposed to celebrate the move made by St James’s Place who are now promising to remove their exit fees whilst also reviewing their fee structure. Hefty exit penalties applied to their pensions and Investment Bonds in particular. According to their current, outgoing Chief Executive, the changes will come into effect in the second half of 2025.

Some suggest that this is the regulator placing pressure on SJP. I might suggest that treating customers fairly (TCF) was introduced by the regulator in 2006, so one might conclude that it has taken them nearly two decades to comply. Then from 2013 fees or rather adviser remuneration had to be agreed with the client under what was known as RDR (Retail Distribution Review) and a banning of commission. The introduction of the new Consumer Duty rules in July 2023 together with some scathing pieces in mainstream media and a drop in their share price (halving since the end of July as investors appreciate that previous revenues may be ‘threatened’) all appear to have prompted appeasement. One might say that the penny finally dropped.

SJP are obviously a financially successful company, some very flattering marketing materials and beautiful offices, which would be the envy of most in the sector. Their advisers currently make up about 1 in 10 of all advisers. They are also a restricted firm, meaning that they sell a limited range of financial products and funds, unlike an independent firm who selects from the whole market.

SJP Share price (30/10-2003 -17/10/2023)

One thing is for certain, there is no denying that their 900,000 clients with around £168bn generally like what they do, despite expensive and rather poor performance of investment portfolios. The truth is that SJP are excellent at branding, and this extends to the advisers (who work and market themselves as ‘partners’) who they put in front of clients. They are well trained and very good at relationship selling (for the record – selling is a good and necessary skill and process). It’s rarely easy to move someone away from SJP by merely stating facts about price and performance.

As someone who believes that the UK needs better advice and more people in receipt of it (including politicians and their Parties), I don’t really have much of a problem with SJP other than until now it has been incredibly difficult to properly compare their charges (because they have been deliberately obfuscated – I don’t think there is another way to honestly view it). They are now set to address this which will almost certainly mean their profit margins are lower, but also that some, perhaps not many, of their clients will seek advice elsewhere.

My main gripe is that our sector needs to earn and demonstrate trust and fairness whilst having integrity. It has taken the regulator far too long to take seriously what the entire sector has known about SJP charges for decades … it’s not the amount, but the lack of clarity.

A POTTED HISTORY AND OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY

St James’s Place was formed in 1991 but under the name of the Rothschild Assurance Group and began trading in 1992. The name changed formally in October 2000 not long after Halifax took a majority stake (60%) in the business. You may recall that Halifax merged with the Bank of Scotland forming HBOS in 2001. We had the credit crunch and despite Lloyds writing off £200m of US subprime debt in December 2007 and then seeing first half profits fall 70% in 2008, they stepped in to acquire HBOS, but traders were ripping them to shreds seeing the share price halve at one point. On October 13, 2008, Alistair Darling announced that the UK Government was bringing the banking system back from the brink, with a 43.4% stake in Lloyds. Just four months later Lloyds stunned the City announcing £11bn in losses at HBOS; and before the end of 2009, the Government stumped up a further £5.7bn for Lloyds. It wasn’t until the end of 2013 that Lloyds finally disposed of its holding in SJP just a few months before it moved from its FTSE250 listing into the illustrious FTSE100.

By way of comparison, I formed Solomon’s in 1999 and it remains independently owned and operating as an independent financial adviser. Since the outset, we removed commission from all protection products and implemented a level playing field of fees, meaning that there was no higher adviser fee for any particular investment product (Investment Bonds and Pensions normally paid advisers much more). There have never been exit penalties on anything we have arranged, except specific products such as VCT, EIS and SEIS, which is due to HMRC regulations regarding minimum durations to qualify for tax relief and nothing to do with advisers or indeed the product providers.

Clearly, we do not have 900,000 clients nor do we have £168bn under management. We have saved our clients an awful lot in costs for investments (cheaper than 99% of the sector), platforms, product selection, reduced losses and taxation. Hopefully our clients are also reassured that they have ample financial protection should the worst happen (we have seen how this has made substantial differences to those who have experienced such matters). In addition, having a clear financial plan that provides for your personal lifestyle choices rather than an assumption that you must want a yacht. Our clients are able to achieve high degree of peace of mind, whilst living in the reality of an uncertain, flawed and at times broken world.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Last exit before…Jemima Thomas2024-02-01T09:20:06+00:00

Taxing times

Dominic Thomas
Jan 2024 • 5 min read

Taxing times

Tax is perhaps one of the most divisive issues. At the time of writing, just before the Christmas break 2023, the Scottish Government has announced that it is imposing the additional rate of income tax (45%) at a much lower level. Unlike England and Wales, the Additional Rate will start at £75,000.

Here in England and Wales, the 45% rate starts at that “only a quango could come up with it” number of £125,140 for tax year 2023/24. So someone earning more than £125,140 pays 45% income tax, but in Scotland the line is drawn much sooner.

By comparison, a Scottish resident earning £125,140 will pay an extra £2,507 on the same income. I doubt that the extra tax is enough to prompt thoughts about moving south, but it may well alter behaviour at the ballot box.

As a reminder, the tax rates for this tax year (2023/24) which comes to a close on 5^th April 2024 are as follows:

Band	Taxable Income	Tax Rate
Personal Allowance	Up to £12,570	0%
Basic rate	£12,571-£50,270	20%
Higher Rate	£50,271-£125,140	40%
Additional Rate	Over £125,140	45%

These are the income tax rates on earned income, not dividends (which have lower tax rates).

If you are breathing a sigh of relief because you live in England or Wales, remember that this tax year saw the Government reduce the higher rate band so that Additional Rate begins at £125,140 rather than £150,000.

Most of us have been impacted by inflation, yet the personal allowance remained frozen as did the basic rate tax band. So more people pay more income tax. This is what the media and whoever is in opposition, like to call “stealth taxes” basically an increase in tax in real terms.

Additional Rate tax was introduced in the tax year 2010-11, and saw 236,000 people pay 45% raising £34.5billion. Ten years later, the HMRC 2020-21 data saw this number increase to 481,000. There is no doubt that whichever way one observes the data produced by HMRC, we all pay more tax.

There are of course some things that you can do about reducing tax or even obtaining tax reliefs, these are all part of a good financial plan. However what I often observe is how little attention is paid to good arrangement of financial ‘stuff’ so that you can minimise tax payments. How much and where from become really important when drawing money from your portfolio. It’s one thing to get tax relief or use an allowance, it’s another to draw money out so that you pay less than 20% tax.

I recently produced a White Paper that you may find of interest called ‘Understanding Adviser Fees’, which includes and explanation about the value that we bring. Whilst I firmly believe that every little helps, if you focus purely on costs and ignore taxes, you will quickly wonder why you bothered. You can find the paper (which is designed to be readable – feedback welcome) here.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Taxing timesJemima Thomas2024-02-01T09:21:01+00:00

The Autumn Statement – the Ghost of Christmas Past

Dominic Thomas
Nov 2023 • 2 min read

The Autumn Statement – the Ghost of Christmas Past

We are in the closing weeks of the year. Our thoughts turn to Christmas celebrations and perhaps looking ahead to the New Year. The familiarity of our traditions poses a challenge to attempts to change them, yet even the harshest of men, Mr Scrooge, managed to pay attention to what is important and change his behaviour.

I don’t think it is contentious to say that the Conservatives are a party of tax cutting and yet we currently have one of the highest rates of personal taxes in the main economies. Few of us enjoy paying taxes, perhaps because often it seems that our hard-earned money is wasted on expensive ideas and ‘kit’ that doesn’t work very well at all … anyone tried the NHS IT system or indeed any ‘converting to digital’ Governmental system, let alone the military’s ability to spend a fortune on malfunctioning weaponry to cite just a couple of examples. We all have opinions. (As an aside the Power of Attorney system is going digital in 2024, so I urge you to sort yours before they muck it up and make the backlog even longer).

The Conservatives came to power in May 2010, admittedly with the assistance of the LibDems, but then we have had an entire mess of Government ever since.

According to Jeremy Paxton in 2018, David Cameron was the worst Prime Minister since Eden:

“[He] got to the top of a tree in order to set it on fire and cleared off, put the interests of his party before the country and decided to have this referendum, believed one thing was the only right outcome for the country, didn’t campaign for it, got the opposite outcome and XXX off. It doesn’t seem like leadership to me”.

Given the PMs we have had since 2018, Cameron might actually look a lot better, the bar seems woefully low, anyway, for now Cameron is back, this time as Foreign Secretary.

The backdrop of a Covid enquiry which merely proves what most of us thought, that Mr Johnson is an unreliable character (I am being polite), we have the prospect of an election looming by the end of January 2025. The Labour party seems set on sabotage and the plethora of political open goals being squandered is lamentable. The traditional approach of appealing to the notion “everyone has their price” is in the hands of the Chancellor, who is being tempted to cut taxes now that inflation appears to be returning to a more comfortable figure (4.7% October 2023 ONS).

Which of us doesn’t want to pay less tax? In an environment of rising prices, seeing your net pay remain pitifully stagnant is irksome. Yet we also know that tax pays to keep society running in some vaguely civil way. We can all find things to disagree with, it’s almost a rite of passage into a fifth decade. It’s clear that ‘the system’ doesn’t work for all, and indeed seems to generally work best for the few. The sadness is that there seems to be so few alternatives to the binary choices we have here in the UK; stuck in traditions that don’t work for the good of the country. Creativity and visionary leadership remain sadly elusive.

There was a time when the economy was thought about as a way of serving society, yet here in 2023 we are evidently a society that is serving the economy. There is no good reason why this cannot change, and despite experience, I remain an optimist in a sufficient number of decent people.

For the record, I have no intention of offending your political beliefs, but I do think we all deserve rather better than we have had. On 22 November 2023 we shall get further notice …

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

The Autumn Statement – the Ghost of Christmas PastJemima Thomas2025-01-23T10:49:36+00:00

Crypto King

Dominic Thomas
Oct 2023 • 3 min read

Crypto King

The appeal of cryptocurrencies is really twofold, firstly some people seem to be making a lot of money from investments into them. Secondly, some people seem to be making a load of money from investing into them. Oh, ok the better reason, is that digital currency enables finance to be arranged more promptly without the dreaded interference of those nasty ‘Bankers’ and avoid problems of exchange rates.

Perhaps I am oversimplifying, but the truth is that cryptocurrency is generally fuelled by greed and a belief that money is very easy to make. The evidence for investment is generally a conversation with a specialist or anecdotal discussions with friends and perhaps a bit of ‘research’ online.

Let me be clear, I am not saying that the banking system is good, it’s terrible frankly, but there is something to be said for ‘better the devil you know’ than the backroom hack shops beholden to organised crime. I am not a crypto expert, I know a couple, but as of right now in 2023, I cannot see a good reason for the typical long-term investor to muck around in the sector.

We see story after story of failed currencies and platforms, where supposed fortunes become worthless. Unlike your portfolio, there are no real assets behind most cryptocurrencies, often just other cryptocurrencies.

I will likely be proven wrong by a friend of yours who makes several million from a couple of pounds. I can live with that, but can you live with your investment portfolio becoming worthless?

The mistakes that investors consistently make are invariably due to four key beliefs

They know what they are doing
They have done their ‘research’
The opportunity is too good to miss
This time it’s different.

Delusion is very powerful and is alive and well in all aspects of professional life. You may have read the BBC story about the ‘King of Crypto’ (Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX). Panorama had a look at the whole sorry mess (have a look on BBC iplayer).

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Crypto KingJemima Thomas2023-12-04T12:17:19+00:00

Don’t leave it to the last minute

Dominic Thomas
April 2023 • 3 min read

Don’t leave it to the last minute

One of the things we take seriously here at Solomon’s is finding ways to improve what we do for our clients and how we do it.

The tax year end period in the last few years has been very busy indeed with a number of transactions being processed very close to the deadline of 5^th April. The team here (once again) stepped up marvellously this year and we all worked incredibly hard to ensure good outcomes for all – but we would like to try and ensure that we don’t have a similar ‘last minute rush’ next year!

So what’s the answer? Possible solutions rely fairly heavily on our clients joining with us in our endeavours. I have been encouraging clients for many years to set up monthly Direct Debit payments to ISAs and pensions (where appropriate) and many of our clients are now doing this (and reaping the benefits of pound cost averaging – see our video here!). I would be happy to discuss this with you if you haven’t already had ‘that conversation’ with me. The alternative (for clients who are able and would prefer to make their contributions in lump sum payments) is to make sure that you do this as early in the tax year as possible (you can invest from the 6^th April onwards).

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Don’t leave it to the last minuteJemima Thomas2025-01-28T10:04:43+00:00

12 Next