investing Archives - Financial Planning in Surrey

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024

Daniel Liddicott
Dec 2024 • 3 min read

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024

Our survey says…

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024 is an annual survey designed to give an overview of how people feel about their preparedness for retirement. Around 4,300 UK adults were surveyed, across all age groups.

This is only the second year that Nucleus have carried out the survey, with 2023 marking the inaugural attempt to gauge the sentiment of UK adults towards their retirement outlook.

The key findings of this survey include:

Low Confidence Levels:

The overall retirement confidence score dropped to 4.6 out of 10. This is down from a score of 6.9 out of 10 from the survey in 2023. Only 34% of respondents feel confident they have sufficient savings to live comfortably in retirement, while 60% expressed doubt about meeting their financial needs.

Saving Challenges:

39% of participants are not contributing to any pension
A fifth of respondents have not saved anything for retirement
Rising costs, such as housing and childcare, are major barriers to saving

Gender and Generational Disparities:

Women remain less confident than men about retirement prospects.
Confidence is highest among 18 – 24 year-olds and declines significantly among those aged 35 – 44

Perceived Income Needs vs. Reality:

Most adults believe they need £20,000-30,000 annually for a comfortable retirement, but this falls far short of the £43,100 estimated by the Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) for a “comfortable lifestyle”

Impact of Economic Conditions:

Public confidence has been affected by broader economic uncertainties, including the 2024 Autumn Budget. Over a quarter of respondents reported feeling less confident after its release

Calls for Systemic Change:

The report advocates for enhanced financial education, early savings plans, and systemic reforms to improve retirement preparedness
These findings underscore the urgency of early financial planning and seeking quality advice to secure a stable retirement future

Where do we come in?

Our aim is to give you the confidence that you need to enjoy retirement by planning ahead and helping you to put appropriate provisions in place, giving you the freedom to go ahead and live the lifestyle of your choosing once you ‘hang up your boots’.

As advisers, we are also keen that both parties in a couple are present and engaged in the planning process. This is just one way that we can help to bridge the gender gap, which the Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index unfortunately revealed remains present. This helps to provide the full picture, gives clarity to all involved and enables both members of a couple to educate themselves on the options that they have.

Lastly, we strive to look after families up and down the generations. As mentioned above, the 35 – 44 age group was found to have some of the lowest confidence levels when considering their retirement outlook. At that point in life, retirement may seem (and probably is) some way off. However, the earlier plans are put into place, the longer they have to cultivate and grow into something robust. If your child or grandchild is in this age group and you think that they would benefit from a conversation with us, please do get in touch.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

The Nucleus Retirement Confidence Index 2024 Jemima Thomas2025-01-21T15:50:46+00:00

A Widow’s Ruin?

Dominic Thomas
Sept 2024 • 4 min read

A Widow’s Ruin?

The summer often produces plenty of occasions to open a bottle of bubbly as we celebrate various events or are simply enjoying ourselves. Perhaps this summer you have celebrated something, maybe a wedding, an anniversary, a big birthday or one of your family graduating. Champagne is invariably linked with celebration.

Living in the Surrey Hills, a short walk from Denbies, I have come to appreciate some of the English attempts to create Champagne – though of course we cannot call it such as it’s from Surrey not the Champagne region. I’m informed that the geology of the Champagne region of France is shared with Dorking (probably not news to the geologists amongst you). Anyway, perhaps you have your favourite – English, French, Spanish or Italian.

When it comes to naming things properly, I was intrigued by the story of Veuve Cliquot (in French meaning Widow Cliquot) which has now made the transition from a 2009 book by Mazzeo to a musical and now to film and is being retold at selected cinemas, so may be one to catch at home for most people.

The story is of the woman behind this now historic and luxurious brand. Business owners will relate to some of the struggles that she faced and conquered, not least of which were the weather, Napoleonic wars and general misogyny of the day. Women will relate, frankly because things have not moved on anything like as much as they should!

Quite how much is fact or fiction isn’t really that important; the messages of the film are there to be taken. Tenacity, optimism, acknowledgement of an inability to control the things you cannot, acceptance of the reality of things; stoic fortitude ushers in change by remaining true to principles and high standards. This is all beginning to sound a lot like the qualities that investors need to attain isn’t it.

I did not know the story and I was unaware of the meaning of ‘veuve’ – my O’ Level French has never been tested beyond very enjoyable trips to France. Whilst I am a regular consumer of wine, I wouldn’t regard myself as an expert; but I have come to enjoy Champagne over the years!

What I find generally inspiring are the stories behind many well-known companies. The original ‘Founder Story’ has been an often neglected element of most marketing, including our own. As Solomon’s celebrated our silver anniversary this summer, I was reminded that perhaps this is a little more than simply reminiscing. Of course there are many Founders and characters that are entirely unpleasant, which is often a subjective opinion, but sometimes … well not so much. Today, we are in a highly inter-connected world and we are all aware of particular billionaires or multimillionaires who are lacking any of the attributes that demonstrate much humanity.

I will never meet Barbe-Nicole Ponsardin who died in 1866 and I am highly unlikely to meet Mr Musk; but I have formed an opinion about both, based on the values that I hold. Yet this is perhaps the heart of the complexity of ethical, socially responsible or ESG investing. The world is complex, people are many things. To some, holding shares in an alcoholic beverage company is unethical, yet holding shares in Twitter (or whatever he wants to call it) invariably will not be screened out of portfolios. The focus is based on the product rather than those behind them.

How we use or minds, tools, resources, time and money are our unique choices and important to each of us being true to ourselves – however many selves we might each be, have or become. I can tell you that I shall be favouring (revealing my biases) the widow’s Champagne. A young woman who was widowed at 27, took on an embryonic vineyard, battled social norms and obstacles, fought for her own financial independence, eventually turning it into a legacy of quality, used in moments of joy and celebration. Now, that’s something that I think is worthwhile.

Here is a trailer for the new film produced by and starring Hayley Bennett, along with Tom Sturridge, Sam Riley and Ben Miles:

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

A Widow’s Ruin?Jemima Thomas2024-09-23T12:32:17+01:00

Abu Dhabi D-I-Y

Dominic Thomas
Sept 2024 • 4 min read

Abu Dhabi D-I-Y

Those who read the financial press may have observed that Bristol-based DIY investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, which has made the founders incredibly wealthy, has agreed sale to a private equity group. It will give shareholders cash up front and if the buyers are to be believed (careful Dominic), the investment will be long-term (meaning longer than the typical three to five years that a private equity group would normally wait before scuttling the ship). At an eye-watering £5.4bn, there will be plenty to go around for the brokers of the deal.

A shareholder in HL will be offered £11.40 for each share which was described by the Board as “fair and reasonable” (the share price reached a peak of £24.19 in May 2019 and had shrunk back to 2013 levels by April 2024 to £7.18.

Managers at HL will of course now be looking over their shoulders, particularly if they haven’t secured shares in the company themselves. HL is the largest DIY investing platform in the UK, but still three times the price of our favoured platform. Technically it is a DIY service with all risk residing with the investor (unlike an adviser relationship). Meanwhile HL’s own latest data suggest that revenue is up 4% but operating costs have increased rather more (by 14%) and profits are down. They hold over £155bn on their platform, with growth largely coming from market returns (remember this is investor selected funds).

I am sure that the consortium of CVC, Nordic Capital and Platinum Ivy will help many people to invest for their futures, I simply remain unconvinced that this will generally benefit the staff or ‘clients’. Certainly technology is expensive, check that again for regulated technology as AI becomes ever more embedded into trading structures and report generation.

Competition that will likely focus on speed and cost reduction is the logical path ahead and one that HL will need in order to persuade its DIY investors to stay on board. This is probably the crucial aspect that platforms tend to forget. Those who are motivated by low price will always seek a lower price. Those that do not see or understand the value of advice will not pay for it, but may inadvertently pay rather more in the end.

Personally I quite like HL, they enable a lot of people to start investing. They are expensive, often having somewhat questionable ‘relationships’ with some investment companies who are then proffered as “Best Buys”; but nevertheless offer a nice, slick DIY service. The staff I have met all seem perfectly decent. Whether the culture changes and cost-cutting becomes particularly deep remains to be seen. Private Equity firms generally look for a lucrative return for owners not customers.

In summary, if you really want to spend your time fretting about Sharpe ratios, alpha, beta, OCF and the right asset allocation, you can continue to do so. Alternatively, we can do all that and take responsibility for a sum that I can assure you doesn’t even buy me a trip to Abu Dhabi, though perhaps Bristol. Of course I’m simply envious that I didn’t think of it 40 years ago!

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Abu Dhabi D-I-YJemima Thomas2024-08-30T15:05:10+01:00

Klopp it

Dominic Thomas
April 2024 • 4 min read

Klopp it

Klopp’s kids beat a Chelsea team that cost a billion to win the League Cup final, confirming belief that Jurgen Klopp is a marvellous manager, one that Liverpool should not let go. I think you would agree that this probably fairly reflects the sentiment across most media platforms following Liverpool’s 1-0 victory over Chelsea.

If you don’t like football, like Ted Lasso, this is not really about football. Stay with me.

Any manager has to select players from his/her squad from those available (not injured). Jurgen Klopp selected a team based on his own criteria, but suffice to say not all the regular stars were available due to injury. As a result, he had to look beyond the familiar, to the rising stars, untested for a big occasion. By the end of the match which predictably went into extra time, there were five Liverpool players under the age of 20 on the pitch bringing the average age of the 11 on the pitch to under 22.

There has been much praise for this bold approach and the legacy that the departing manager will have provided, a future that looks exceedingly bright. Credit where it is due, it was indeed an impressive result, though I think it fair to say that Chelsea are not at their best. However, the ages of players, cost and who won are not the issues here.

The tendency of the media is to move towards extremes, failing to retain a level head, seemingly stuck in an adolescent state of black or white. Much is being made of the success of Liverpool’s youngsters with euphoric sentiments about the future.

It is perfectly possible that Liverpool’s young players go on to have very successful (trophy winning) careers, but it also depends on undeniable luck. Skill as an athlete is the entry price, but luck will often feature. I mean luck in avoiding injury, having sufficient stability, opportunity to play. Typically players retire at around 35. James Milner is currently 38 and playing for Brighton, having moved from Liverpool at the end of the last season. He is one of the oldest and most successful premier league players. He was born in 1986 and his six minute Boxing Day debut for Leeds made him the second youngest premier league debutant, just nine days before his 17^th birthday. Milner has won lots and has the second highest number of Premier League appearances and is closing in on the record of 653.

Milner, like most athletes, does what he can to ensure he stays fit and skilled, but he has also been lucky with his fitness that has enabled him to continue playing and moving between teams that have a real prospect of winning (Manchester City and Liverpool since 2010).

Football pundits and commentators tend to forget luck, they forget survivor bias and often make statements with such a degree of certainty as a voice of authority, that many or perhaps most assume them correct. In the end they may be, but it’s unknown and bluntly, unlikely.

Investing is the same. We all see charts on billboards, newspapers or the internet showing how wonderful a particular investor is. There is no guarantee at all that this will continue or be repeated. Certainly they may have a good succession program in place, or assistants making the results more collaborative, but the truth is that we simply don’t know how much was luck and good health (investment managers also get ill, cancer, stroke, mental health issues and so on). Many or most investors elect for the belief that it is possible to consistently beat the market … denial of reality is a thing.

When James Milner made his debut at Leeds in 2002, Liverpool’s most successful period was already in decline, indeed they had never won the Premier League in his entire career until he helped them do so in 2020 some 30 years since their last League win (a record that their arch rivals Manchester United hope they do not match, but are now approaching halfway).

Sport is fickle, so is investing. As much as we would prefer not to acknowledge it, preferring to believe that we make our own luck – or where opportunity meets preparedness. Luck is part of the reality.

That’s why we avoid costly investment strategies that rely on the luck of a Manager. Over a reasonable time, one that is the real experience of investors like you, only about 5% of managers beat the market. So are you willing to bet your family’s wealth in 2024 on who they will be by 2044?… and pay a hefty premium for the privilege?

No, neither are we. At this point I cannot even tell you who will win this season’s Premier League which is over halfway through and concluding this Summer …

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Klopp itJemima Thomas2024-04-04T15:15:37+01:00

Timing isn’t everything

Daniel Liddicott
Jan 2024 • 6 min read

Timing isn’t everything

Despite a relatively rocky 2023, according to data provided by Timeline, global stock markets produced returns of around 15% for investors for the calendar year, attributed largely to a positive surge in performance over the last few months.

Consequentially, the end of 2023 saw UK investors flock back towards investing in equities as a reaction to their strong performance to end the year. As explained by the Calastone Fund Flow Index (FFI), this followed six months of a vast number of investors selling from equity funds between May and October 2023. Despite this, £449m was invested back into equity funds in November 2023.¹

Investors who decided to put their money back into equities at that time essentially chose to buy shares at a higher price than was available throughout the majority of 2023. This got me thinking – is there any other scenario in which people would be happier to purchase something when its price is potentially at its highest? So far, I have not been able to come up with anything! I mean, you wouldn’t wait to buy toilet roll until the price goes up, would you?

For the casual investor, the news and media are the main drivers behind deciding whether or not to invest in equities, painting extreme pictures of negativity and “never before seen” tanking of the market as a whole that will surely never recover – (SPOILER ALERT) even if this is not the truth. Whilst past market performance is no guarantee of future results, historically recovery has always followed periods of poor returns for equities. In reality, aside from taking information from the news, it would take a great deal of time, effort and resources to research market trends, to find and invest in equities that you believe are about to rise in value and help you to attempt to beat the market. This is where active fund managers come in.

SPIVA are a Standard & Poors (S&P) agency who monitor the performance of active funds and their managers against the major global stock markets. According to their data, only 7.81% of active fund managers in the United States were able to beat the market (S&P 500) over the last 15-years*. This trend can be seen for all regions that SPIVA gather data on, including Europe and the UK. Whilst the outlook for active fund managers improves over a one-year period (rising to 39.10% of managers beating the market in the US), consistent replication of these results is apparently impossible for the overwhelming majority. And these fund managers are afforded the time, effort and resources that I alluded to earlier, whilst still achieving poor results for those who invest in their funds.

The Timeline portfolios that the majority of our clients are invested in are called tracker funds. These essentially track the major global stock markets, aiming to achieve as close to market returns as possible with the aim of beating inflation, rather than beating the market itself. If you can’t beat them, join them! After all, we are trying to ensure that your money maintains the same purchasing power for decades in the future, to which inflation is the primary threat. The UK’s main stock market index, the FTSE 100, averaged an annual return of 7.3% from 1993 to 2023, with the average annual growth of inflation sitting at only 2.1% over the same period². The FTSE 100 provided average annual returns that more than tripled the growth of inflation. We believe that equities are the asset of choice when it comes to beating inflation over a long period of time.

If you have met with Dominic or myself in the recent past, you may have heard us refer to the importance of “time in” the market rather than “timing” the market. Leaving funds invested in equities for a prolonged period of time, which we would normally define as at least five years, affords your investments the time to recover from the inevitable, periodic falls that are certain to happen. It’s our job to help you “stay in your seat”, stick to your financial plan and remind you that these phases will come and go, just as they always have. Warren Buffett, often considered the most successful investor of all time, once said: “Wall Street makes its money on activity. You make your money on inactivity… it’s just not necessary to do extraordinary things to get extraordinary results.”

*Figures correct as at 18/01/2024

¹ Equity funds gather £449m inflows after six months of net selling (investmentweek.co.uk)

² How to invest to beat inflation – Times Money Mentor (thetimes.co.uk)

SPIVA | S&P Dow Jones Indices (spglobal.com)

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Timing isn’t everythingJemima Thomas2024-02-01T09:20:30+00:00

Royalty Income

Dominic Thomas
Dec 2023 • 1 min read

Royalty Income

For those of you who are business minded or ‘entrepreneurial’ (perhaps the most overused business word), the ‘rules’ around royalty income may be changing.

In recent decades we have all seen, particularly in the arts, how doing your work once and then getting paid repeatedly for it is the most honest definition of a ‘passive income’.

This is most evident in the music and film sector where stars of the past continue to earn income from repeats, resales, commissions and so on of a performance long ago. In fact I think it was George Lucas and his Star Wars franchise that really brought this to most people’s attention.

Imagine, you worked hard, made an album or wrote a book and forty years later you are still collecting money for your labour. Some of our clients are in this happy position.

So the twist is that this appears to be changing, well for some anyway. Various financially successful artists have been selling their back catalogue for a single, substantial lump sum, forfeiting the future royalties.

I wonder what this suggests? Perhaps that they would prefer to have the lump sum to spend, invest or gift rather than a lifetime of income. Perhaps they are concerned about the ability and resources to prevent plagiarism in the future or to restrict the use of their materials in other ways. Perhaps they are concerned that AI will actually make them irrelevant. I don’t know why, but it’s certainly an unexpected change to the basic business model in some sectors.

In September we learned that pop princess Katy Perry has agreed a deal to sell her back catalogue for around $225m. Her actor husband Orlando Bloom played Will Turner in Pirates of the Caribbean, so no need for bootleg albums for Katy (or perhaps bootstrap albums, with such a load of pieces of eight).

Katy Perry reportedly makes $225m by selling her music catalogue: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66853047

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Royalty IncomeJemima Thomas2023-12-17T13:36:40+00:00

How long are you investing?

Dominic Thomas
Feb 2023 • 8 min read

How long are you really investing?

As you know, we use a risk profiling tool, indeed if you have been a client for some years you will know that these have evolved over time. These all tend to test how you feel about investment loss. It’s a bit like throwing a snake into someone’s lap and asking them how they feel about snakes.

In all my time as an adviser I have never met anyone that likes to see the value of their investments reduce. Yet of course they do from time to time – and time is the key word, or perhaps concept.

Investment returns come from companies providing “solutions” to society at large. This results in products and services being sold for a profit and investors in those companies share the rewards of the endeavour. Wherever you are now, take a moment to consider all the things in front of you, to your left and right, including your attire, and perhaps the medication and food you have already ingested today. It’s made, but almost none of it is made by you.

Risky business?

Almost all investment theory works on the assumption that whatever can reduce in value the most is more “risky”. Cash tends not to reduce in value much, except for the impact of inflation or the bank failing. Shares can alter in price dramatically in the course of a few hours. So to simplify, shares are classified as high risk and cash low risk, with Bonds (and there are numerous types) classified as a little higher risk than cash as they provide return of capital and fixed income, much like cash.

Getting the balance between how much you should hold in cash, bonds and shares will dictate your returns (we call this asset allocation). How long you invest for is also a key part of the results. Unfortunately we live in a world obsessed with the short-term and immediate, yet you will almost certainly be investing for the remainder of your life, which I hope is a rather long time.

The interactive chart below shows 1 year returns, 5, 10 and 20 year returns with increased allocation towards shares from Bonds. In this instance the chart uses purely UK data for UK shares and UK Bonds, our portfolios are actually global, but this will hopefully provide some help with long-term thinking and what “risk” really is.

Figures reflect back-tested data for the period 1926-2020. In cases where the minimum return is a positive number, the red bar still portrays the min return but with a positive percentage.

You can draw your own conclusions, using the intelligence bestowed upon you, or you can listen to the the latest ideas about what will happen in the next 12 months, I would advise and suggest taking a much longer-term approach. For the record, the UK stock market is only about 5%-7% of the world stock market, depending on the value of the pound, which is why our clients invest globally.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

How long are you investing?Jemima Thomas2025-01-27T16:24:51+00:00

Tax year ending

Dominic Thomas
Feb 2023 • 12 min read

Tax year ending!

There are not many weeks left of the 22/23 tax year, which ends on Wednesday 5^th April. As a brief reminder of the key issues, I have done a quick summary … if you are not sure of what you have used or what you can use, please get in touch with us as soon as you can.

PENSIONS

Everyone under the age of 75 can contribute £2,880 into a pension and get basic rate tax relief, irrespective of any income. This is as close as it gets to ‘money for nothing’
The annual allowance of £40,000 applies to those with incomes of £3,600 – £240,000. You and an employer may contribute up to 100% of your earned income (capped at £40,000) between you
Those earning over £240,000 need to be careful; your allowance reduces by £1 for every £2 of income over £240,000 until it reaches £4,000 – which includes any employer payments

ISAs – INDIVIDUAL SAVINGS ACCOUNTS

Any adult can invest up to £20,000 over the course of the tax year into an ISA which grows free of income tax and capital gains tax
Those aged 18-40 can use a Lifetime ISA allowance of £4,000 if this is for a deposit on a first ever home. The Government will add £1,000

CAPITAL GAINS

If you are selling an asset / investment (which would include rebalancing them) this triggers capital gains. The 22/23 allowance is £12,300 of gains before you pay any tax, but this is falling in 23/24 to just £6,000 and then £3,000 the following tax year. So if you are going to do this anyway, I would encourage you to get on with it – perhaps you have some shares that you don’t really want …
Trusts also pay capital gains, but only have half of the personal allowance, so even more incentive to take profits and rebalance
You can delay payment of capital gains tax using some investments (ask/see below)

INCOME

If your income exceeds £100,000, you begin to have your personal allowance of £12,570 reduced by 50p for every £1 above £100,000. The personal allowance is the amount of income taxed at 0%. So it would be prudent to have bonuses paid into pensions for example
Dividends – the first £2,000 of dividends is tax-free in 22/23
Interest for non or basic rate taxpayers is 0% on the first £1,000 of interest (savings allowance) and £500 for higher rate taxpayers. Additional rate (45%) taxpayers don’t get the allowance. As some deposit accounts now pay 3% or 4%, you may be drawn into this (a higher rate taxpayer only needs £16,666 in savings earning 3% interest of £499. You need to declare all income to HMRC through self assessment
If you really must insist on a cash ISA (please only for ‘short-term parking’ of money) then this would ensure the interest is tax-free, but rates on cash ISAs are much lower than savings accounts now
If you are not using your full personal allowance and have investments that provide taxable income, this may be a sensible moment to trigger income that uses your allowance
If you rent a room in your home, there is a tax-free rent-a-room allowance of £7,500

ANNUAL GIVING

You can gift £3,000 to any individual without recourse to tax by the recipient or your estate. If you do any substantial giving please put a scan of a signed note of this on our portal
If you are feeling generous, you are also permitted to gift your newlywed children £5,000 or grandchildren £2,500

SPOUSE ALLOWANCES

If you have a spouse who does not earn up to the personal allowance of £12,570, you can elect to have 10% of this (£1,257) added to your own allowance
Spouses also can benefit from sharing assets and effectively doubling exemptions and allowances

ALTERNATIVES & HIGH-RISK INVESTING

It is generally thought that VCTs, EIS and SEIS are really for more sophisticated investors, about 3% of the population. All are long term in nature – meaning 6-10 years. Unlike your portfolio elsewhere (which – if we are managing it – will be an enormous portfolio of global equities), these are very small by comparison. Do not do these on your own unless you know your Sharpe ratio from your Beta. Unlike the above, the investments below can experience permanent loss:

Venture Capital Trusts

Tax-free income from your investment
Tax-free capital gains
Tax relief of 30% on your initial investment (tax reducer)

Enterprise Investment Schemes

30% tax relief on your investment
The ability to defer owed capital gains tax
Loss relief
Exempt from inheritance tax

Seed Enterprise Investment Schemes

50% tax relief on your investment
Reduce your due capital gains tax bill by 50% immediately
Exempt from inheritance tax

DON’T FORGET

Income taxes are tiered. Each slice of your income is taxed at a different rate.

Band	Taxable income	Tax rate
Personal Allowance	Up to £12,570	0%
Basic rate	£12,571 to £50,270	20%
Higher rate	£50,271 to £150,000	40%
Additional rate	over £150,000	45%

Please remember that HMRC will apply penalties for late payment and fines for non-payment which can result in the very worst of punitive measures – a custodial sentence.

As ever, be sure of two things – death and taxes. Neither are terribly welcome.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Tax year endingJemima Thomas2025-01-21T16:33:56+00:00

New year, new me and all that

Jemima Thomas
Jan 2023 • 4 min read

New year, new me and all that…

This year I decided to do a ‘semi-dry’ January. I’m not one for resolutions usually, but after a Christmas spent both in London and Manchester filled with seeing lots of friends and family, there was a fair amount of celebratory gatherings I was a part of, and it would be nice to start the year feeling lighter both mentally and physically (as well as saving a bit of money this month!).

When it comes to changing habits, I’ve learnt that stopping anything abruptly and going ‘cold-turkey’ never works for me. It always feels like I’m punishing myself when I’m effectively trying to ‘better’ myself, which makes no sense at all. If I want to cut down on something, weening myself off is the most doable (for me at least).

That being said, by the second half of 2022 I was putting away larger amounts into my savings than usual. I had set myself a realistic goal, and even with all the fun winter festivities going on, I’m proud I kept at it. I’d be lying however, if I didn’t acknowledge that I did feel some guilt and a little sadness by doing it. I like to splurge on my loved ones, and I’m annoyingly a ‘yes person’ especially when it comes to an event that involves all my friends. But this Christmas … I resisted. I stuck to my budget on how much I’d spend on each person and I didn’t waver, I turned down (a few) more excessive meals or theatre shows, and I prioritised what was most important.

As someone who’s not a great saver, this is all a pretty huge deal, and I have no regrets on sticking to my guns. I won’t hide the fact that compromising my lifestyle can sometimes be harder than I would like. Of course I could make it easier by putting away less, but knowing that my future self will be in a better position has made the compromises a positive move. I hope I’ll feel the same in February after I’ve had fewer gins and tonic.

I value and respect those who are honest about their experiences when it comes to compromising, as we all do it often in life (in our relationships, our finances, our work etc). It’s making sure that these compromises are worth the long-term goal. If they’re not, a readjustment is needed. This is why here at Solomon’s we strive to ensure that our clients feel comfortable and positive in long-term planning, because the fruits of the compromise can be golden.

You can read more articles about Pensions, Wealth Management, Retirement, Investments, Financial Planning and Estate Planning on my blog which gets updated every week. If you would like to talk to me about your personal wealth planning and how we can make you stay wealthier for longer then please get in touch by calling 08000 736 273 or email info@solomonsifa.co.uk

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

New year, new me and all thatJemima Thomas2023-12-01T12:12:39+00:00

Purpose – how to plan…

I have shelves of books about financial planning, investing and anything that helps me to improve how I do what I do and how to simplify, explain and address issues that actually matter to you our clients.

One of the lessons that I have learned over the last three decades is that planning for the future is often too far into the future to be meaningful. We all hope to have a rewarding, purposeful and enjoyable life, but thinking about the next thirty years (2052) often feels too distant from the present.

TIME TRAVEL

As I write, it is November 2022, and looking backwards is easier. Three decades ago (November 1992) is the same distance backwards as it is forwards to 2052. Back in 1992 we had just had the ERM crisis, unemployment was 2.7m, Charles & Diana were still unhappily married. The same time traveller distance back to November 1962 and 007 premiered Dr No and Z-Cars was first aired. The Cuban Missile Crisis had just happened, and The Beatles had just released their first single ‘Love Me Do’.

Suffice to say thirty years is a long time and much changes, though most of it is barely noticed on a day-to-day basis. As humans we tend to have short memories, often having to relearn the same lessons.

The cashflow modelling that we have been using with you since it was available, suffers from the same problem, projecting decades out into the future. Of course, I remind you that “this is a version of the future that almost certainly will not happen, as life is not linear and stuff happens” or something along those lines.

On the one hand I need to extol the rationale, logic and purpose of having a long-term mindset, and on the other I am aware that we really cannot predict anything. The last five years were probably unthinkable to most of us decade ago.

So we focus on the gradual accumulation of small changes that all add up to a better future. Taking advantage of improvements in technology, lower charges and efficiencies. Yet I still find the daily use of pad and paper something that I am unlikely to give up easily. Even holding a printed document is better than a pdf.

Planning ahead for me means considering the year, quarters, weeks and days. I use a planner and despite all the workflows and tech, the planner is really my personal account and guide. This is really a place for my values and aspirations or goals both personally and for the business. The self-accounting enables me to not simply get things done, but to get the important things done… or at least progressed.

Quarterly planning is nothing to do with investment valuations or market conditions, but ensuring you are taking action to progress towards your goals whilst living out your own values consistently and authentically. Planning with purpose.

BACK TO ALL BLOGS

Purpose – how to plan…Jemima Thomas2023-12-01T12:12:42+00:00

12 Next