Funds: Aegon gone as Kames not able

I imagine that somewhere there are printers and marketing departments rubbing there hands with glee at the constant name changing that goes on within the financial services industry. I have no idea why, but Aegon Asset Management was rebranded as Kames Capital yesterday.
The press release was sent out yesterday and much of the news only came through once we had all packed up and gone home. Why they were not able to communicate this sort of change in advance I have no idea – but it doesn’t sit well with me and one can only be left thinking “why the rush?”. Most of us were only really getting used to the Aegon name having had the Scottish Equitable Asset Management name dropped in 2001.
This means extra work for everyone, writing to investors with holdings in Aegon funds and updating a myriad of data files and entries. This now seems to be a part of the normaly way things are in financial services – and there seems to be something like this on at least a monthly basis. To my mind this seems incredibly wasteful and not doing the financial services industry or investors any favours. If anything this always smacks of a smoke screen.
Some of our ethical investors use the Aegon Ethical Equity fund which will now be called the Kames Ethical Equity Fund… see what they did there… genius!
Click here for the Kames Capital press release – be warned it contains the usual corporate news release terminology. Sorry for my rather expasperated tone, but this is no KC and the sunshine band.
We are a boutique firm of financial planners. We create financial plans designed to achieve a desired lifestyle. We will craft and implement your plan that will provide you with the greatest chance of accomplishing your unique goals based upon the values that you hold. Financial products are little more than the tools to achieve your required results
Call us today or visit our website for more information and to arrange a meeting
Funds: Aegon gone as Kames not able2023-12-01T12:49:13+00:00

Its not just Fantasy Football but fantasy Funds too

I know, I know.. football is about as overexposed as it gets. Yesterday saw the end of the “transfer” window. This is the biennial shuffling of cards that seems to amuse oligarchs as much today as it did in the playground swap market. All that really happens is that a lot of agents make a lot of money by getting hapless footballers to switch teams, hopefully to get a better chance of playing for more money. The slight twist being that some will now consider moving to a lesser team in order to play more frequently, but perhaps not as well paid but compensated by the increased visibility and revenue from other “endorsements”. Amusing in some respects as Managers reverse opinions and decisions that they were holding as fact just days earlier.
It was with interest then that I came across an article in my quality trade press by Paul Farrow. He was berating the Fund Management industry for failing to heed its own advice – to stay true to core principles and the long-term strategy. He points out that for almost every new fund launch another is closed. He states that since 1999 2,660 funds were launched and 2,486 were closed. As a result, invariably the duff funds (or “poorly perfoming” funds) are regularly taken out of the statistics, which in turn hides the real story of massive under performance of the market. As a result the “league tables” or rather performance tables are highly inaccurate and should not be relied upon. Add to this the comings and goings of Fund Managers, mergers of Investment Houses and you quickly get a sense that perhaps the investment industry does just as much shuffling of the pack as the football business. However rather than farming out an under performing striker to lesser divisions they simply get discarded to non-league and non-statistic status.
This explains why Fund Management groups have a reasonably large marketing budget. It would certainly be a full time job trying to massage data to show a poor fund in a good light, making it appear difficult to select anything else. Yet selecting the right Fund Manager is a process that is riddled with problems, so much so that to pick the winning team in say 10, 20 or 30 years time is about as pointless a task as gluing the leaves back onto trees in the hope of delaying Autumn. This merely adds to my conviction that in practice selecting the best Fund Manager is not possible consistently and why we use cheaper funds that track the market, providing a market return less costs. This is something that over the long-term the overwhelming majority of Fund Managers fail to achieve. You may find the document on my website a helpful resource in this regard. In truth, I have no idea who the next “Anthony Bolton” will be any more than I know who will be the next Alex Ferguson.  
We are a boutique firm of financial planners. We create financial plans designed to achieve a desired lifestyle. We will craft and implement your plan that will provide you with the greatest chance of accomplishing your unique goals based upon the values that you hold. Financial products are little more than the tools to achieve your required results
Call us today or visit our website for more information and to arrange a meeting
Its not just Fantasy Football but fantasy Funds too2023-12-01T12:49:14+00:00

New Student Loans Won’t Be Cleared

I wonder if you ever have dreams that you are sitting your O or A’Levels or your degree finals? These are a very distant memory for most of us, but for those about to embark upon University life the exam nightmare may become rather more prevalent than it is for the majority of the population.

For students starting University in a years time the new fee system will commence. University fees will be generally in the region of £9000 a year, though of course this will depend on the University and the course. In addition, living costs will need to be met – this is a variable amount, but for those living away from home and outside of London the maximum living cost grant is £5,500 which increases to £7,675 for those living in London (but not at home). These can all be converted into the student loan. So on the face of it you can quickly see how a 3 year course in London can quickly cost over £50,000.

However, unlike the current system, the debt is linked to inflation with a further 3% added on top of this. Inflation in the UK is currently around 4.20% – so the debt would rise by 7.20%. Repayments of the loan need to begin after 3 years – irrespective of whether or not the course has concluded. However payments do not need to be made unless earnings are more than £21,000. Many graduates may struggle to find employment initially and whatever the level of earnings, the debt will increase by inflation+3% each year. The loan lasts 30 years.

Once earnings are £21,000 or more, 9% of income over £21,000 is paid to the Student Loan Company to reduce the debt. So if the graduate earns £21,500 the repayment to the £50,000 loan (plus inflation) will be 9% of £500 which is £45 and is paid as £3.75 a month. Alternatively the graduate is earning £28,000 and pays £630 towards the debt (£52.50 a month). In essence the repayments are small and frankly unlikely to reduce the outstanding balance by very much. This is more like a form of taxation akin to National Insurance rather than a traditional loan.

The biggest problem for the graduate is that of inflation as the debt is linked to inflation plus a further 3%. The expectation for many will be that salaries rise quickly due to early career progression as a result of having a degree. So a graduate that progresses to an income of £50,000 will be repaying £2,610 a year or £217.50 a month. This is collected directly from PAYE earnings. But this all takes time and whether deliberate or not, I don’t see much evidence that the debt will actually be cleared over 30 years for most students. Career breaks, redundancy, life throwing a curve ball – all impact the maths. Only those earning significant incomes will actually get close to clearing the loan.

So some of the “facts” that have been presented in the media are somewhat erroneous in practice. Whilst mortgage lenders say that the loan will not count against graduates, should they wish to borrow other funds for a home or car, the reality is that this is a long-term commitment that the graduate must meet, so in effect does reduce the affordability of a loan and the amount that can be borrowed by something like 3.5 times the annualised repayment.

My own calculations with inflation at only 1% (4% to the loan) for the debt and the income increase a graduate earns is that there is no chance of the debt being cleared over 30 years. Indeed the repayments do not cover the original starting amount of the loan and hardly clear a third of the loan.  Higher rates of inflation make the likelihood of debt repayment lower. Incomes may well rise far faster for graduates, but this remains to be seen in practice. So this may be some comfort to students and their parents. However, the impact of  beginning a loan at say 21 and only finally seeing it end at 51 is not a prospect that I would wish on anyone. Any balance at the end of 30 years is written off. So I think that the Government have got their sums wrong (they won’t get much of the debt repaid).

Thoughts? well… this is really a tax. Graduates will have to be careful to ensure that their reporting to HMRC is very accurate every year under self-assessment. The Government seem to have taken the view that the majority of the loans will never be cleared, but they do get a steady stream of additional revenue for 30 years. The real question will be how the graduating generation manage their finances to provide for their futures and provide homes for themselves and their families. At this point in time, these same graduates will be pretty much forced to pay 5% or more towards their pensions and have a harder time building a sufficient deposit for a home and they won’t get their State pension until they are 68. So I wonder if there is something rather naive in the assumption that they will look after us in our old age!

Whatever your view, paying a £50,000+ loan at a rate of £52.50 a month for someone earning £28,000 is about equivalent to a mobile phone contract. To say that the loans have been poorly explained and pitched to UK plc is an understatement. Context is everything.

 

Dominic Thomas
Solomons IFA

You can read more articles about Pensions, Wealth Management, Retirement, Investments, Financial Planning and Estate Planning on my blog which gets updated every week. If you would like to talk to me about your personal wealth planning and how we can make you stay wealthier for longer then please get in touch by calling 08000 736 273 or email info@solomonsifa.co.uk

New Student Loans Won’t Be Cleared2023-12-01T12:49:15+00:00
Go to Top