ISA Reforms – will my ISA be subject to tax?

Matt Loadwick
Post written: July 2026  •  Published: July 2026
2 min read

ISA Reforms – will my ISA be subject to tax?

In the 2025 Autumn Budget, the Government announced reforms to the ISA regime. The headline measure of these proposed reforms was to reduce the Cash ISA annual allowance to £12,000, while the limit for Stocks & Shares ISAs and Innovative Finance ISAs would remain at £20,000. For those aged 65 and over, the Cash ISA allowance would remain at £20,000.

The objectives of these reforms are to simultaneously encourage investment into the UK economy, (which would clearly be welcomed given our fairly plodding levels of growth in recent years), whilst encouraging higher levels of investment amongst UK consumers, often referred to as retail investors. Rather than people having too much of their wealth ‘sat in cash’, where it becomes subject to inflation risk, the hope is that a wider uptake of investing will enable more people to benefit from real growth over and above inflation. Out of the G7 nations, households in the UK have the lowest proportion of wealth held in equities, so there is clearly progress to be made in this regard.

There’s no doubt that achieving these objectives would have hugely positive impacts, and in that sense at least we can see what the Government is hoping to do. However, it would be fair to say that the proposed methods could be brought into question. The ‘carrot vs stick’ approach certainly springs to mind, and it seems to me there may be a little too much stick and not enough carrot …

It is fairly apparent to us, that education is a significant factor in the relative under-investment of UK retail investors, and wonder whether more focus in this area might bear more fruit than the rather blunt reforms that have been proposed.

Notwithstanding, the Government are currently pressing ahead with this and have recently released an ‘Anti-circumvention rules factsheet’. This is essentially a list of additional measures designed to close off potential loopholes that some retail investors may otherwise have sought to exploit. Primarily, they’re looking to stop people from using Stocks & Shares ISAs (therefore taking advantage of the higher annual allowance) to hold cash, or “cash-like” products.

To disincentivise this, it is likely that a 22% charge on interest paid on cash held in non-Cash ISAs will be introduced.

It’s easy to see why such a measure generates headlines. The concept of paying tax on funds held in a famously tax-free wrapper is of course perverse, and with a flat-rate tax charge of 22% (with no use of the Personal Savings Allowance), it’s no surprise that it’s causing some concern.

It is common practice for investment platform providers to retain a small cash balance within Stocks & Shares ISAs, even those that would otherwise have 100% of the portfolio invested in the stock market. This cash ‘buffer’ is widely used to extract platform fees, but the cash buffer also typically earns a small amount of interest (usually well below market-leading rates). It is important to note that it is only the earned interest on the cash buffer that would be subject to the 22% tax charge, were this to be brought in as proposed in April 2027.  Under the proposals, providers would automatically report and pay the charge to HMRC, so individuals would not be required to declare anything themselves.

Should this go ahead as proposed, it does not need to cause mass panic. There is some understandable concern of the potential for instances where people using cash (or cash-like products) to ‘ringfence’ a portion of their portfolio for income could be subject to higher tax charges as a result of having higher cash holdings. As a business we’ll be alert to the implications for these scenarios in particular.

In the main however, as long as the Stocks & Shares ISA is used in the typical fashion, the vast majority of retail investors wouldn’t actually notice the charge being implemented, particularly against the general fluctuations that are part and parcel of being invested in the stock markets.

In terms of next steps, the Government has confirmed a technical consultation with industry on the draft legislation. We will be sure to keep our fingers on the pulse with this as things progress. If you have any questions or concerns on any of this, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

References:

UK GDP Growth World Bank Data: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=GB

Full Fact – UK GDP in the G7: https://fullfact.org/economy/gdp-growth-international-comparisons/

HMRC: ISA reform Anti-circumvention rules factsheet: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fiscal-events-2026-factsheets/isa-reform-2027-anti-circumvention-rules-factsheet

HMRC data on the amounts held in ISAs since 2008: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-savings-statistics-2025/commentary-for-annual-savings-statistics-september-2025

Have a question or feedback about this article?

Please share this with a friend

ISA Reforms – will my ISA be subject to tax?2026-07-10T12:20:09+01:00

NS&I Big Data and the WOPR Problem?

Dominic Thomas 
Post written: March 2026  •  Published: July 2026
3 min read

NS&I Big Data and the WOPR Problem?

Adapting to the new world is far from straight-forward and NS&I are yet another publicly humiliated organisation that has failed to migrate data to a new system, costing billions. These sorts of problems are common and normally don’t come to light in the private sector, unless there has been a GDPR data breach.

Getting your money into someone’s system is easy, getting it out often isn’t as simple as it could be. That’s why when we review who we use to hold your investments we consider what is required. Customer service is something that is overlooked when assessing solutions, yet can become a significant barrier.

In order to provide “better” (cheaper) services to their millions (250m) of customers, NS&I undertook a £2bn Business Transformation Programme in 2020 to modernise their systems. Two years into the project red flags were all over the place, signalling that it would be unachievable, so in 2024 they rebooted the project and over £1.3bn more has been required. It certainly seems that the project is still unlikely to be delivered before 2028 and the Committee of Public Accounts have, I think it fair to conclude, torn the management team of NS&I to shreds, noting weak controls, poor and delayed decisions and frankly a naïve lack of understanding of the complexity of the issues. They are still not of the view that NS&I really are up to the task or owning the scale of the problem.

Most of us have a soft spot for the old Post Office, trusted by many families for generations. Sadly, sentiments are not the way to assess service, which is shaped by experience.  Unfortunately, my experience of NS&I isn’t terribly good. Not too long ago they offered advisers the opportunity to digitally connect with client accounts, we have had minimal success with this, but honestly, it’s been something of a nightmare, with links and passwords not working. Registration processes have been awful.

You probably have seen in the news in late March that NS&I have made so many blunders that they are now in the position of having to pay significant compensation to savers whose accounts seem to be either inaccurate or missing.  At the time of writing, there is nothing on NS&I’s website that even mentions the debacle.

Remember that NS&I are basically a front for HM Treasury to raise funds from the public safely; using the money to fund capital projects in the country. Essentially, you are lending your money to the Government.

If you have NS&I products, Premium Bonds, Savings Certificates, Cash ISA etc, please get in touch and we will attempt to include these in our reports to you and will hopefully provide you with additional support should you experience problems with them.

Here is a reminder of the dramatic warning about data security that many of us received over four decades ago in 1983 when a student (Matthew Broderick) hacked the NORAD defence system WOPR (War Operational Plan Response) in the film War Games. The issue isn’t really the technology, but the lack of good human thinking.

(War Games (1983), Directed by John Badham, Starring Matthew Broderick, Ally Sheedy and John Wood Produced by United Artists)

Let us know about your NS&I Accounts.

References:

Public Accounts Report Feb 2026: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/51662/documents/286154/default/

NS&I Transformation Programme: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/9280/nsis-transformation-programme/

NS&I Board: https://nsandi-corporate.com/governance/who-we-are

NS&I Prize Checker: https://www.nsandi.com/prize-checker

War Games (1983): https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086567/

What we do: https://www.solomonsifa.co.uk/what-we-do/

Have a question or feedback about this article?

Please share this with a friend

NS&I Big Data and the WOPR Problem?2026-07-03T11:54:26+01:00
Go to Top