Barclays to cease Financial Advice
Call us today or visit our website for more information and to arrange a meeting
My blog has been tweaked, revamped and refreshed. Let me know what you think.
Paul Whitehouse (Harry Enfield’s chum) plays the ghost of a father that has since departed, only obvious at the end of the piece. I don’t have any advantage in promoting AVIVA – its a decent advert and I reckon a pat on the back to their marketing team on this one. Not everyone has life assurance, fewer still have a Will, fewer still have an Enduring Power of Attorney… all rather important for anyone that has anyone else financially dependant upon them.
Here’s the advert. What do you think?
The FSCS who seem to be spending a reasonable sum advertising and encouraging people to complain are expected to annouce a £93m levy for 2011 to IFAs shortly – according to Money Marketing. That is money that my firm and many others collectively have to stump up to cover the cost of firms that have… shall we say.. got it wrong.
£93,000,000!
There is no opportunity for IFAs to contest this – we basically just have to roll over and cough up our share of £93,000,000. It makes no difference how good our firm is, the bill is simply split – like “going Dutch”.
The obvious conclusion – much of our fees actually go towards covering the cost of compensating people that have been poorly advised by lesser advisers, reducing our own profit and threatning the sustainability of our own business. This makes little sense, but there it is. Any suggestions?
First my goat was wrangled by Euroblundersrus having read an article in Money Marketing suggesting that Countries bailing out those, wait for it (technical term)… bankrupt nations should not be paid their agreed level of interest, but be doing it out of the goodness of neighbourlyness. Well, we’re not talking about lending a bag or sugar or fixing a leaking drainpipe… but bailing out nations that have messed up their public services and promised money that they don’t have. So to suggest that the risk of doing this is not rewarded is plainly a failure to understand risk or business or money…which is a little bit of a short-coming if you are working in the European Parliament presumably to encourage nations to act responsibly and in manner that is not delusional.
Secondly I read another article suggesting that people (that’s you AND ME) do not understand that Absolute Return funds can go down as well as up. I know its a complex subject, but even Dell Boy knew that nothing goes up forever and that there are risks in everything. Yet we are being told that the term is misleading people…well is it? if you see a fund called an Absolute Return Fund.. do you assume it can only go up? Perhaps I’m wrong on this.. but the sort of people I advise are not covered in velcro and fuzzy felt,only coming to life when a puppeteer is around.
The world doesn’t give us all that we would like it to. We won’t always get what we want. Good times come and go, but there are inescapable life truths that are, well… inescapable.. money is not free, even if we are in dire straights.